Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?

[wattsup]

@gotoluc

As usual a good video and well explained, but we must convened that @allcanadian is right on two counts. First, replications should adhere to strict reproduction but what are the chances of making exactly the same coil, but don't worry, it never hurts to try other things as we all do it. Second, this is Tesla all the way, but I think even @allcanadian would agree that @TR is using some pretty cool variations.

I have been able to get good resonance with DC pulsing but rarely in the 200k range. Usually always in the 1-2mhz range.

But I have one question. Given stuff I have tried out on The Tesla Project thread, it would seem that the current reversal effect that @TR has shown would still happen without those four diodes and maybe not consume .6 volts each.

I will try @TR's circuit this weekend.

[gotoluc]

I think Mr.Reed is exactly right, a replication is just that---- a replication of the experiment. To use completely different components,voltages or values of components is "NOT" a replication in any sense of the word. As well Mr.Reed utilizes an air core coil, which I noticed is the primary from a microwave transformer, the qualities of this coil are far removed from the iron core others have used. This is the biggest problem I see here in the forum, people throw some random components together and call it a replication, which it is most certainly not, then state their replication has failed. I would submit "they" have failed due to a lack of understanding, like the old saying goes---- "don't blame the messenger". In any case Mr.Reed's circuit is based on technology Nicola Tesla perfected over 100 years ago, this is nothing new in any way, it has just been ignored by the masses for a very long time.
Regards
AC

Hi allcanadian,

I did test Tommey Reed's circuit with an air core MOT primary!... you should know better than that by now   I used one a year ago to test your Tesla circuits you share: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0etbntkxbs

I spent several hours testing many coil configurations, frequencies, voltages, pulse widths and so one and in the end chose the coil, frequency, voltage and pulse width that gave the best result to do the video.

I have been testing and studying back EMF collection for over a year now and have never found it to contain more energy then the energy put in. However, when a coil is in resonance there seem to be more energy than back EMF but I have not yet found the best way to extract the energy.

Luc

[chrisC]

@gotoluc

As usual a good video and well explained, but we must convened that @allcanadian is right on two counts. First, replications should adhere to strict reproduction but what are the chances of making exactly the same coil, but don't worry, it never hurts to try other things as we all do it. Second, this is Tesla all the way, but I think even @allcanadian would agree that @TR is using some pretty cool variations.

I have been able to get good resonance with DC pulsing but rarely in the 200k range. Usually always in the 1-2mhz range.

But I have one question. Given stuff I have tried out on The Tesla Project thread, it would seem that the current reversal effect that @TR has shown would still happen without those four diodes and maybe not consume .6 volts each.

I will try @TR's circuit this weekend.

@wattsup
btw, TR mentioned to me on the phone the other day that his flat coil came off a old microwave and it's copper. The new one s found on modern (made in China) microwaves are aluminum and not so good. Maybe you should find the right ones if you want to be as close as possible. Just a thought.

cheers
chrisC

[nyctuber]

I'd suggest dropping '600% efficient' from the topic title. After the Mylow thing, it would probably be wise to wonder why Tommy did not show a closed loop OU (recharging the batteries with back EMF) system from day one. I think the answer is fairly obvious.

[chrisC]

I'd suggest dropping '600% efficient' from the topic title. After the Mylow thing, it would probably be wise to wonder why Tommy did not show a closed loop OU (recharging the batteries with back EMF) system from day one. I think the answer is fairly obvious.

See his last but one video. He's starting to close the loop!

cheers
chrisC