Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Chris W. Brown's KML Coils -- Super Simple Harvesting of Aether?

Started by sterlinga, April 15, 2009, 09:05:46 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bob Smith

Did anyone ever figure out what's going on in these KML coils?
I suspect that there's a cancelling of magnetic fields, increased capacitance and voltage. 

One other thing that I've thought about is the notion that radiant energy seems to be concentrated at the inside of a coil core.  Could it be that there's an interaction between the coil's radiant component and the effects described above to make it an ideal coil for accessing or transducing energy from the electrostatic environment?
bob

Neo-X

Maybe this KML coil is similar to TREC. But still in TREC i dont know how the electrons is collected in capacitor if the metal plate is insulated? Can someone explain that?

Farmhand

Quote from: Neo-X on August 06, 2014, 04:01:47 AM
Maybe this KML coil is similar to TREC. But still in TREC i dont know how the electrons is collected in capacitor if the metal plate is insulated? Can someone explain that?

It's charge that accumulates on the capacitor plates not electrons. Electrons don't hardly move at all in a conductor, far too slow
to be actually what accumulates on the capacitor plates or powers a load.

Just as the displacement current flows through a capacitor the charge accumulates on the plate as if it were a capacitor plate,
but the charges Tesla says are from cosmic rays striking the plate and depositing positive charges on it.

The positive charges deposited on the plate accumulate on the capacitor positive plate and the negative charges from the ground
accumulate on the negative plate.

The rate of energy collection is feeble by Tesla's own words and is mainly a discovery rather than a useful power generation
device, it could power very low power devices like clocks for as long as the device lasts. And it does in fact work but people
expect more from it than it was ever able to produce. So it's just as OU in principal as anything is.

Any device that outputs more than is supplied by us is doing something similar, it's utilizing energy from somewhere, nothing
creates energy, and so anything that outputs more energy than "we" input is OU. It's that simple, that means solar wind and
hydro ect. are all OU because they output more energy than is input by us. The efficiency of conversion the free energy
harnessing device has is irrelevant. What makes OU is energy supplied by us compared to energy output to a useful load,
there isn't anything else OU could be defined as.

The big OU scam is that there is no OU already.

..



Neo-X

Quote from: Farmhand on August 06, 2014, 04:59:52 AM
It's charge that accumulates on the capacitor plates not electrons. Electrons don't hardly move at all in a conductor, far too slow
to be actually what accumulates on the capacitor plates or powers a load.

Just as the displacement current flows through a capacitor the charge accumulates on the plate as if it were a capacitor plate,
but the charges Tesla says are from cosmic rays striking the plate and depositing positive charges on it.

The positive charges deposited on the plate accumulate on the capacitor positive plate and the negative charges from the ground
accumulate on the negative plate.

The rate of energy collection is feeble by Tesla's own words and is mainly a discovery rather than a useful power generation
device, it could power very low power devices like clocks for as long as the device lasts. And it does in fact work but people
expect more from it than it was ever able to produce. So it's just as OU in principal as anything is.

Any device that outputs more than is supplied by us is doing something similar, it's utilizing energy from somewhere, nothing
creates energy, and so anything that outputs more energy than "we" input is OU. It's that simple, that means solar wind and
hydro ect. are all OU because they output more energy than is input by us. The efficiency of conversion the free energy
harnessing device has is irrelevant. What makes OU is energy supplied by us compared to energy output to a useful load,
there isn't anything else OU could be defined as.

The big OU scam is that there is no OU already.

..

Do you mean the electrons in the plate vanish after it was stricked by a cosmic rays and so the plate become positively charged? Then where did the electrons go? Disintegrated into a tinier particle?