Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Latest: No back torque generator.

Started by broli, May 01, 2009, 09:04:43 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

gravityblock

Quote from: BWS on May 15, 2009, 02:06:09 PM
@gravityblock
well ok, please let me clarify:
Yes of course the wind is moving in a tornado, but the wind does not represent the magnetic field there, the wind is moving relative to (perpendicular to the B field causing it's induction/circulation) the B Field which is along the vertical axis of the tornado.
-BWS

Planes fly in the eye of a hurricane because it is so calm on the inside.  B Field lines always form closed loops.  The closed loops can easily be seen in the circular spin of the wind.  The B Field lines must not have a start or end point. The inside of a cyclotron can not represent the B Field cause there is no force there.

I'm going to say this and say it only once.  God told me that the magnetic field or flux moves with the magnet.  Go debate this with him, he offered no explanation to me why this is.  I'm just trying to explain or understand this with the limited knowledge I have. 
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

BWS

@gravityblock,

I'm hesitant to reply, so you can tell me to shut up and I will, but you've raised a great point about airplanes...  The center of a hurricane would have a very large and very uniform magnetic field.  The magnetic field is not force, only potential force needing the right circumstances (available reactive material which is usually other magnetic material).  It is my belief that (similar to what EE's believe) a gradient of field is needed for there to be interaction.  Since there is no focused source of the giant uniform field, there will be no net effect on the plane or anything in it.
  Does moving a field include rotating a field?
-BWS

gravityblock

Quote from: BWS on May 15, 2009, 02:52:07 PM
@gravityblock,
Since there is no focused source of the giant uniform field, there will be no net effect on the plane or anything in it.
  Does moving a field include rotating a field?
-BWS

There appears to be a potential force where the winds are spinning. Maybe you should fly the plane there and see if the uniform field is a focused source or not.  After doing this, you may learn where the field is actually located.
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

lumen

Well as for the test!
I used a stationary 3" dia. ring magnet and a .125 thick steel disk and by spinning only a single wire as a conductor to the edge of the magnet it is obvious that it does generate current.

I also tested spinning the magnet and tried to obtain a current flow by trying to shield the return line with another magnet. This setup was unable to produce any output!

I made a small video so anyone can see the results of this test.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSWwrvT_c8w

broli

Quote from: lumen on May 15, 2009, 03:50:43 PM
Well as for the test!
I used a stationary 3" dia. ring magnet and a .125 thick steel disk and by spinning only a single wire as a conductor to the edge of the magnet it is obvious that it does generate current.

I also tested spinning the magnet and tried to obtain a current flow by trying to shield the return line with another magnet. This setup was unable to produce any output!

I made a small video so anyone can see the results of this test.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSWwrvT_c8w

That's a cool setup you've got there I wish I had something like that. But can you make some illustration of the two different setups because it's not very clear from the video.

Edit: nvm the hq version made everything clear. I'll think about something to say now.