Mylow Motor was a fake

[wattsup]

Added to above post.

[wattsup]

Added to above post.

[maryyugo]

i'm just curious. hypothetically speaking, what would you accept as "extraordinary evidence"? just want it clarified, it kind of gives you an out no matter what "evidence" is shown. furthermore, that argument is based on an unproven premise.

Are you kidding?  Initial screening of Mylow's gadget needs nothing extraordinary.   Mylow's evidence is a Youtube video.  Any idea how easy it is to fake one?  How many different excellent methods can be used to bamboozle with one?  Since when is science evidence presented on Youtube alone?  Ever hear of refereed peer reviewed journals?  Scientific meetings?  How about university and private research labs like Earthtech?  All Mylow needed to do to initiate respect and credibility was give a copy of his machine to Sterling or anyone who could properly test it.  What did he do instead?  Did you notice?

[WilbyInebriated]

Are you kidding?  Initial screening of Mylow's gadget needs nothing extraordinary.   Mylow's evidence is a Youtube video.  Any idea how easy it is to fake one?  How many different excellent methods can be used to bamboozle with one?  Since when is science evidence presented on Youtube alone?  Ever hear of refereed peer reviewed journals?  Scientific meetings?  How about university and private research labs like Earthtech?  All Mylow needed to do to initiate respect and credibility was give a copy of his machine to Sterling or anyone who could properly test it.  What did he do instead?  Did you notice?

no i'm not kidding. nor was i talking about mylows case, that's why i said hypothetically speaking... did you notice? hypothetically, meaning a pmm in general. you answer my single question and i will address the rest of yours.
my point still stands. why should mylow have to do this to "initiate respect and credibility"? has earthtech offered up some new EVIDENCE of the big bang theory lately? or jref? how about putting to rest the einstein issue? because that i didn't notice.

edit:
@wattsup, i'm just trying to back up what i felt to be the gist of your statement about the sign over the door @ overunity.com. if you feel it is not relevant or productive, please feel free to remove it. i will take no offense.

[LightRider]

(re-post from Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim)

Voilà,
   
I put the events (zooming, shaky camera ,....) on the graph in relation with time...
see for your self.


if an addition or correction should be made, please let me know.

Thanks,
LightRider