Thane Heins Perepiteia Replications

[LarryC]

NOW IF I WANT TO PRODUCE USEABLE POWER I NEED TO STEP DOWN THE OUTPUT AS I SEE YOU ARE DOING AND THE TRANSFORMER LOAD IS CAUSING THE REQUIRED RPM TO BE HIGHER.

Yes, I've witness that effect, but not as high a rpm, was wondering if the lower ohm's with larger diameter wire was part of the requirement for the higher rpm's.

BUT THIS IS NOT ALL THAT IMPORTANT BECAUSE WE WILL SIMPLY BE RECTIFYING OUR OUTPUT AND FEEDING IT INTO BATTERIES SO THERE WILL BE NO NEED TO STEP DOWN THE OUTPUT.

Okay, I'll try rectifying with the new cores.

MAKE SURE IT IS TIGHT - AND ARE YOU STILL USING IRON CORES  IF SO PLEASE REMEMBER THE CORE HYSERESIS CURVE/REACTION TIME WILL IMPEDE COIL PERFORMANCE.

Tight windings is not a problem and I will not be using the old iron cores. Still working on the best alternative.

Thanks, Larry

[CRANKYpants]

@ ALL,

I AM FINALLY GETTING SOME GOOD RESULTS WITH THE TRANSFORMER - VIRTUALLY NO INCREASE IN PRIMARY CURRENT (ON LOAD) AND VIRTUALLY NO CHANGE IN PRIMARY POWER FACTOR (ON LOAD).

FOR A CONVENTIONAL TRANSFORMER THE CURRENT OUGHT TO INCREASE (ON LOAD) AND THE POWER FACTOR OUGHT TO BE THE SAME AS THE LOAD.

SO ALMOST ALL THE POWER IN THE BI-TOROID PRIMARY IS REACTIVE POWER (ON LOAD) - MEANING THE TRUE POWER IN THE PRIMARY (ON LOAD) IS ZERO OR CLOSE TO IT.

VIDEO ON THE MORROW. 

T

[CRANKYpants]

BI-TOROID PHOTO DATA.

T

[alan]

Was this also based on the retarded lenz effect?

[CRANKYpants]

Was this also based on the retarded lenz effect?

NO THE RETARDED THANE EFFECT. 

T

PS

THERE IS A DESCRIPTION OF THE TRANSFORMER OPERATION SOMEWHERE ON THE OLD THREAD - PERHAPS SOMEONE CAN DIG IT OUT? 

AT ANY RATE THE PHYSICAL MODEL IS ALMOST IDENTIACL IN OPERATION TO THE CONCEPTUALIZED MODEL

WHEN SECONDARY 1 AND SECONDARY 2 ARE ON LOAD THEIR BACK EMF INDUCED FLUXES ENTER EACH OTHER AND MAINTAIN THE VOLTAGE ACROSS THE LOAD RATHER THAN GOING DOWN THE HIGHER RELUCTANCE PRIMARY FLUX PATH - CAUSING THE PRIMARY IMPEDENCE TO DROP AND DRAW MORE SOURCE CURRENT.

I GUESS I SHOULD REMOVE THIS AND POST IT ON THE OLD THREAD - SINCE IT DOES NOT APPLY HERE?

IN THE VIDEO THE PRIMARY CURRENT ACTUALLY DECREASES BUT 3 OR 4 mA ONCE PLACED ON LOAD
HERE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fq_yGELmhV4

T