Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Magnetic motor?

Started by helioc, June 16, 2009, 06:49:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

lumen

How about the ktoy?
I thought it was OU.

Low-Q

In example 1, it takes no energy to let the small magnet enter the big south face of the other magnet.
In example 2, it takes energy to rotate the big magnet clockwise because the small magnet ends up eccentric to the big one in a mode wher it wants to be pushed left, and the big magnets wants to go to the right.
The force that moves the mass, hence the energy, that interacts between those magnets will ofcourse be the same for both magnets but oposite, so it must take the same energy to move the one magnet or the other. The sum is zero.
No OU.

Vidar

lumen

Low-Q, I have been doing some measurements on a similar setup and found a condition that looks like a possible OU condition.
I do not want to say to much at this time, but the data shows significant energy gain. I may actually be on the same path as STEORN so I should not say too much unless I develop a fully operational device. Something they have not done.
(I have indicated the NS polarity incorrectly in the example)


utilitarian

Quote from: lumen on June 23, 2009, 07:46:45 AM
Low-Q, I have been doing some measurements on a similar setup and found a condition that looks like a possible OU condition.
I do not want to say to much at this time, but the data shows significant energy gain. I may actually be on the same path as STEORN so I should not say too much unless I develop a fully operational device. Something they have not done.
(I have indicated the NS polarity incorrectly in the example)

There are of course good reasons to keep something to yourself, the chief one being profit potential.  However, the downside is you waste the collaborative potential of this website.  And in this case, since there is a 99.999999% chance that you simply missed something, sharing your idea would probably just save you a ton of time.

lumen

Actually, It's because I have only tested the data twice and until I can confirm the entire cycle I thought it best not to waste everyone's time.
If your interested in doing your own testing, I have no problem posting the configuration scheme that I believe (at this time) yields OU results. It's very interesting but I will first need to do a sketch so it can be easily understood.