Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[TinselKoala]

Well...
''When you are done there, the video of my build of Aaron's circuit is uploading''

This is VERY benevolent and above and beyond the call.

Please post a link

.
PS
TK
I don't know if you noticed but Rosemary is being denied access to the forum
I told her I would PM Stephan [perhaps you can]
this could have nothing to do with OU,, but still needs attention after all she is the Boss 
Chet

Yes, I noticed her "saying" that, but I never have known Stefan to put anyone on "no read", and how could she be denied if she hasn't applied?

She will have to take that up with Stefan, I guess. Do you really think that I would ask Stefan to let her in, after the way she's treated me? Uh-uh. She can figure it out for herself. I doubt if it is a problem on this end.

But she is not tough enough to play in this 'hood, I'm afraid. Homies eat that girl fo breakfast.
She was crying and moaning by the fourth page of the NakedScientists thread. And they are Nice, not at all like me!

I would like everybody to take a look at Aaron's video at the times I mention above. Look at the waveform when the scope does catch it. See the shape? See the inductive ring portion on the trailing edge? You are looking at a mosfet that is running at such a high frequency with so little gate voltage that it is not fully turned on before it is being turned off. Hence the volt meter drop. Hence the triggering dropout. The waveform during dropout is not substantially different--you can still see the bands of contrast moving past--it is simply not locking in. When it does, several times, you can see the ordinary waveshape. As he changes the gate voltage and the duty cycle, the features of the shape change and at some point the scope is unable to trigger. The mosfet is NOT oscillating any more or less at these points.

My Philips scope has an especially good trigger circuit, and since it is a true 2-beam scope (not a 2-trace scope like the Tek) there is no finagling with the trigger signal by the beam chopper. It is hard to fool the Philips, but I managed it for a few seconds.

(The digital scopes like the Fluke and even the LeCroy divide their bandwidth between the traces sort of like a 2-trace analog. But the true 2-beam scopes like the Philips and really expensive full-BW DSOs don't. It is like having 2 complete oscilloscopes using a single CRT, whereas the Tek and similar 2-trace scopes chop a single beam to display the 2 traces. And hence introduce artifacts that must be understood. )

Jibbguy can explain that, I'm sure he knows what I mean.

Still processing, the title and description aren't there yet either...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9F4kqesrds

[ramset]

TK
please describe what it is you do to cause the false trigger
BTW you don't have the ability to do a sloppy build [Ain't in yah]
You say you can do it at will '' THE effect"""
i need it in print in your words

[TinselKoala]

TK
please describe what it is you do to cause the false trigger
BTW you don't have the ability to do a sloppy build [Ain't in yah]

I figured it out, after watching Aaron's vid again. (I need a drink, out of booze, ohno...)
He is using a much higher driving freq from his 555, and a long duty cycle of 50 percent or more. This, plus the high inductance of that load, results in the inductive ring being a substantial portion of the pulse duration, not just a little spike like at 2.4 kHz drive.
So now, you just turn the gate drive down (increase the resistance of that pot) until the scope's trigger is being shown the garbage in the very first little piece of the ringdown. And since the trigger circuit is not so good, or it's set on the wrong coupling, or just because it is a 2-trace scope in "vertical mode" trigger, it can't keep up and the waveform slips past in the time dimension. You can see from the contrast bands that the waveform is nearly the same when it's slipping as when it's caught. Plus, since the mosfet isn't turning fully on before you turn it off and start the ringing, the current draw goes down and the batt voltage goes up.
Now turn the gate up or the duty cycle longer. The mosfet turns on fully so the current goes up and the batt voltage goes down. And the scope's trigger sees a cleaner rising portion  of the wave and locks it in.

This is a lot easier to do on the other scopes. My Philips has rock-solid triggering and no beam chopper stuff to get in the way of the trigger. But I was able to fool the Philips, even at the low 2.4 kHz used by Ainslie, and me (but not Aaron.)

[poynt99]

Explains my circuit:
http://www.feelthevibe.com/free_energy/rosemary_ainslie/ainslieheater.pdf

Youtube video demo:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z84u7--u3Qw

When the circuit is setup, it is common sense how to get the mosfet to go into high frequency self oscillation. Duty cycle is irrelevant as Rosemary said because it can happen at 99% duty cycle, which I have done and it still sends power to the front battery.

This group is too hard on Aaron. You just don't understand him.

Isn't it evident that Aaron has already learned all there is to know about basic electronics and electrical theory?

When are you guys going to finally learn that despite 40 years of extensive design and use of the common buck-boost converter circuit, that there is more there than meets the trained eye? Yes, indeed, your formal training is what is preventing you from seeing the truth. You must also know by now that ALL well-established "laws" in science are simply just poppycock! They can not be valid, even after millions of hours of study and use.

And for goodness sake, how many times do you need to be told that inductive kickback is a free energy effect, unbeknown to even the likes of Tesla, who by the way was only a mechanical engineer, and had no formal training in electricity! But I digress. Use the force Luke! It is there for the taking if only you would forsake the laws of nature.

Of course do not be afraid of using your test equipment in the utmost unconventional manners. You DO know that this is the real intended use and operation of this equipment don't you? It is 100% valid to unknowingly obtain "good" results, as long as everything "looks" the way you have so desired it to be.

You have so much to learn, you learned folks of norm. Let the man teach you because he knows a great deal not commonly known by your common electrical technician. For example, USE that energy so freely supplied by the "environment", it is a free gift from the cosmos. You only pay for it once, and it does work for, not once, but TWICE! Yes, you can believe your eyes this time...TWICE! All that energy obtained from your battery is only half of what you get out. Are you beginning to understand now?

You guys would be so lucky to have Aaron (qiman) join us here, for we have so much to learn you and I. We can only keep our fields crossed that he will.

Until then, please try to erase most of the common sense and logic form your brain, you know that it is only holding you back from your next great "discovery!".

.99

[ramset]

99
unfortunately you are right !!
This is how Aaron comes across,equally unfortunate ,is they don't recognize the opportunity of having men that sincerely search for the same things, but with better understanding and equipment
You guys save a lot of wasted time at this forum and are worth your weight in GOLD
Just the facts
Chet