Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[qiman]

Scoped across shunt 5V / 50us: -

Wrong waveform. That looks like the waveform of a probe not even connected or grounded to anything. And you have the negative happening before the positive.

Show the real shunt and across the load.

[qiman]

Oscillation video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OiSWJ4fp-k4

1. TK claims the oscillation is a red herring. (disbelief or lack of skills?)

2. He also says no matter what, he just can't get the mosfet to "misbehave." (admitting incompetence)

3. He showed on a scope that when his grok grok circuit was in "oscillation" the waveforms
all flat lined. MH was quick to point out that it was an obvious sign the oscillation
concept was bogus. If that is what he calls oscillation, it is complete FRAUD.

I already showed it in my old vids, here is a better view with the updated circuit.

In full grokness...

[Hoppy]

There are "points" that your skeptical group bring up - and is on record to show how much you, Poynt, Tinsel Koala and any other skeptics have a strong consistency in being wrong and making false claims.

   1. TK's (Tinsel Koala) claim the Quantum article timer is wrong (FACT - it works)
   2. TK's claim the Quantum article circuit won't oscillate (FACT - it does)
   3. TK's claim the oscillation is a red herring (FACT - it isn't)
   4. Poynt99 and Poynt's claim there is NO AC in this circuit at all (FACT - there is in the load inductive resistor)
   5. All claims the diode can't help charge input battery (FACT - it does)
   6. All claims the spikes will damage the mosfet and that the ringing should be stopped (FACT - this mosfet IRFPG50 is designed EXACTLY for this kind of application)
   7. All claims that the spike would be too small to be significant (FACT - on a decent circuit the voltage is 4 times the input voltage, it charges batteries or caps - it is VERY significant)
   8. All claims that when the mosfet is off, the battery cannot conduct and therefore won't receive a charge (FACT - the diode in the mosfet allows just this exact current conduction as it is designed to do this!)
   9. All claims that the spike will disappear with improved circuit connections, etc... (FACT - it only makes the spike bigger)
  10. All claims that the inductive resistor will change resistance as it heats up will throw off all the numbers (FACT - these resistors are made to be VERY ACCURATE at these operating temperatures. That is the whole point. They can be within 5% across a WIDE range of temperatures but the most discrepancy will be when they are extremely cold (way below ambient - or way too hot - this demonstrates the skeptics knowledge of this kind of resistor is completely lacking)
  11. Skeptics claim that a battery capacitance analyzer is an accurate way to determine battery capacitance for load testing and this supposedly makes the actual draw down tests unnecessary. (FACT - they are good only for sorting through batteries to see which ones need replacing or not. They are in NO WAY AT ALL - an accurate way to see what a battery will deliver.)
  12. When skeptics analyzed my waveform of the shunt - it was determined all the ringing was above the 0 line in the positive including the bottom half of the ringing. (FACT - The middle of the positive and amplitude of the ringing after the negative spike is in fact the zero line - and by not knowing this, they admit they don't understand how to read a waveform.)
  13. The skeptics claimed that the ringing cancels out any charging effect the negative spike will give. (FACT - The negative spike reduces what the battery delivers in net - the ringing down itself cancels itself out as far as battery charging ability but provides extra heat to the coil.)

There are a LOT more.

Oh dear, loads more 'facts' and plenty more in reserve 

Hoppy

[Hoppy]

Wrong waveform. That looks like the waveform of a probe not even connected or grounded to anything. And you have the negative happening before the positive.

Show the real shunt and across the load.

Yes, wrong scopeshot selected - too many on my camera! Should be as under 0.2V @ 50uS.

Hoppy

[TinselKoala]

Irrelevant scientific quackery.

Start timing the test after it is at a stabilized temperature and battery drops to certain voltage from full charge.

With the control wattage on the same battery after charged up, do not start timing until battery is also down to certain voltage.

This is an ACCURATE way to do it.

You are completely wrong.
As usual.

Battery voltage in this test is not a good number to use, because you do not know sufficiently well the state of charge of the battery, its capacity, its discharge parameters, and a number of other things you need to know.

And you continue to lie and distort.