Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[sparks]

  The magnetic field is secondary to the efield propogation.  A moving charge disrupts the flow of virtual particles that create charge.  Leedskalin was right.  There are two currents in his perpectual motion holder.  One supporting negatively charged mass and one supporting positively charged space.  In a flow of current electrons move in one direction while the lack of electrons moves in the other.  In a p doped semiconductor the p comes from positive charges. There are no electrons moving around the lattice of a p doped semiconductor stratta.  There is just space moving around.  On subjecting the pdoped crystal to an electric field SPACE MOVES.  The hubble flow is simply space moving.  Most likely space is moving towards a very massive something somewhere.  Einstein said it.  Mass screws around with space.  It bends it-distorts it but all in all moves it.  Our perceptable Universe could be a matter of scale and we all are existing inside what an outside observer would call a light hole.  A bubble in a superdense plasma soup.

[Grumage]

In Grumage oscillator I think the ferrite toroids become saturated by the peak oscillating currents when the load is a single piece of wire, so this very very low impedance greatly modifies (reduces) the primary coil inductance too (the influence is due to the close mutual inductance coupling) and this lower inductance causes the frequency to go higher (I agree with Leo48).   It is okay that the Royer oscillator basically a saturable core oscillator by default but the very low impedance a short piece of wire represents can enhance the saturating process.

Why the current goes down a little in the shorted output case?  It is very likely that the new LC tank circuit what is created by the shorted output will have a bit higher resonant impedance versus the unshorted output case so the current could go down a little.

Why the DC supply voltage increases by 0.2V?  Well, perhaps its behaviour at 575 kHz (its inner impedance and regulating properties ) is much different than at 65 kHz, this can count already, the usage of several ceramic capacitors in parallel with the supply voltage entering the oscillator board may help remedy that (use 47nF, 220nF and maybe 470nF ceramic type capacitors all in parallel).

IF you have an L meter, you may check how the primary inductance changes (remove the coil from the rest of the circuit and remove the C capacitors from both sides of the coil assembly) by measuring the primary L first with the secondary coil open, then shorted with that piece of wire.  This new L value across the primary could shed some light already and this will be influenced in the working oscillator by the saturating cores due to mainly the peak currents. 

To answer the possible reason why the current goes up so much when the halogen lamp is the load:  with the L meter (if you have got one) you may check also how the primary inductance changes when the secondary is loaded passively with the lamp albeit the lamp's cold resistance is much lower than in the hot filament case.  The explanation on the possible phase angle variations in the oscillator angryscientist has written about can also be valid.  Also, do not be surprised when the working behaviour of this oscillator changes due to the usage of the parallel capacitors at the supply voltage entry points and this changed behaviour may be valid for the lamp load case too.

Gyula

Hello Gyula and all.

Hat's off to you all,  between  you the riddle is solved. The primary winding or Copper tube in this case's iductance changes due to the condition of the secondary. I followed your advice and checked with my LCR bridge meter. Armed with the results I then checked them with an LC resonance calculator who's results showed, not a match of frequency but as near as makes no difference.

I am still intrigued however by the short circuit condition. Today I placed a Diode in the pos rail to isolate the switch mode power supply from the circuit and noted first the volt drop across the diode. Then I shorted the secondary and we still see about 200mV increase and a corresponding drop in current.

Many thanks for your input, My reasons for this line of research is because many of the schematics posted seem to rely on a copper tube or rod through a torroidal ferrite core. BTW take another look at the circuit I posted. It is  Royer oscillator without a center tap, but beware, don't try bringing up the voltage applied from zero. One Fet will close almost immediately creating a deadly short and then sudden death will occur, bin there done that!!
Cheers Grum.

[verpies]

Any chance of knocking a neutron loose and subsequent decay into electron/positron production and gamma.

According to conventional theory - no, beta decay rate cannot be influenced but its orientation can.

IMO increased electron density favors conversion of neutrons into protons and ejection of high-speed positrons in the process. (β⁺ decay).
The positrons get emitted from the two poles of the spinning nuclei, so if the nuclear spin axes are polarized, then the positrons will get emitted in non-random directions (parallel to the spin axes) and become concentrated (directionalized).  IMO the high-speed positrons can cause additional β^- decays of susceptible nuclei accompanied with ejection of high-speed electrons this time.  IMO if these speedy positrons and electrons are confined inside matter then their chances of causing secondary reactions are increased.  Materials that are capable of both positive β⁺and negative β^- beta decay would be the preferable gain media for such processes because of their ability to decay in both directions.
I don't know about nitrogen but copper is one of such materials.

If streams of these high-speed electrons or positrons become directionalized, then they form strong pulses of electric current that can be inductively coupled or used in other ways.

[jbignes5]

  The magnetic field is secondary to the efield propogation.  A moving charge disrupts the flow of virtual particles that create charge.  Leedskalin was right.  There are two currents in his perpectual motion holder.  One supporting negatively charged mass and one supporting positively charged space.  In a flow of current electrons move in one direction while the lack of electrons moves in the other.  In a p doped semiconductor the p comes from positive charges. There are no electrons moving around the lattice of a p doped semiconductor stratta.  There is just space moving around.  On subjecting the pdoped crystal to an electric field SPACE MOVES.  The hubble flow is simply space moving.  Most likely space is moving towards a very massive something somewhere.  Einstein said it.  Mass screws around with space.  It bends it-distorts it but all in all moves it.  Our perceptable Universe could be a matter of scale and we all are existing inside what an outside observer would call a light hole.  A bubble in a superdense plasma soup.

Mass doesn't screw around with space it displaces the natural medium. Not all of it but only a percentage. Since space wants to stay balanced the displacement of the medium has to go somewhere. Yes like a bubble it becomes more dense and slowly fades back to the ambient space level. We see this bubble as our atmosphere and the same can be seen as the cloud around the atom. If there is a displacement of the medium of space that creates a vacuum of that medium. This is the reason we see gravity. As the medium rushes in to fill the vacuum a rather strange thing happens. The charges that are free in space flow along with that flow towards the center of that vacuum. This does many many things. First off gravity is felt. Secondly once the charges get to the center they become trapped and create great amount of heat. While the charges flow towards the center this also creates great amounts of magnetic forces. All of this is the results of the medium being displaced by matter.


It's so simple it will make you laugh.


If we could change the scale at what we see we would understand that we are in matter of a larger scale that spans millions of light years. It would be like looking through a micro scope then transporting to that scale and it would look like what we see when we look in outer space.


Most of the simulations that we have now of the universe looks like we are living in a fibrous matter all connected and flowing over millions of light years. upon viewing this one can only conclude that it's all a fractal. The further we look the more we find in either direction.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mxVAsnb9CE4

This is a simulation that we made from what we have observed in our universe.

This all relates back to the container under water example that Tesla proposed. And it is exactly how TK is getting the results he is getting. He has a vacuum that is the earth. He creates a big electric field and the charges flow towards that vacuum but he induces a current as the charges rush by the coil via the electric field and flow into the vacuum that is ever present in our planet. So simple you'd laugh.

[guruji]

Interesting thing in TKvid that they used salt water for the earthed radiator and in one of his comments he says that the generator will work without earthing including a small circuit.