Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 232 Guests are viewing this topic.

Zeitmaschine

Quote from: Grumage on March 26, 2013, 04:44:17 PM
They used, if I can remember correctly a Quadrature transformer. It changes the phase angle so the disc recieved less torque or was even able to reverse it.
Interesting!

Unified Power Flow Controller

Quote from: Hoppy on March 26, 2013, 05:04:17 PM
Nothing gets in or out  :)
Then leave a hole in it!

verpies

Quote from: Hel on March 26, 2013, 10:24:05 AM
There's need to reason well on the point you issued.
Impedance matching can be a problem with AC, since when mismatched, reactive current goes back to the
source and no or not all power can be delivered to the load.
We are working with DC here, and if your bulb can't shine is just a matter of not enough power, plain and simple.
Impedance matching is also applicable to DC, just the imaginary part of the complex impedance disappears leaving only the resistance. 
See the Maximum Power Transfer Theorem.

For an incandescent light bulb, matching the resistance of the bulb's filament to the internal resistance of the DC source, makes a lot of sense.
For example, if the HV DC source had internal resistance of 10MΩ, then to maximize the power dissipated in the bulb, the bulb's filament would have to possess the resistance of 10MΩ, too.  Alternatively an internal resistance converter could be used (e.g. a step-down DC-DC converter).

Incandescent light bulbs emit most of their light due to resistive heating of their filament, which is proportional to the square of the current (I2R) flowing through them.  Voltage is not responsible for the light emitted by incandescent bulb's heated filament. 

Light emitted by the rarefied gas inside fluorescent bulbs or gas inside incandescent bulbs, is a different story.

jbignes5

Quote from: Hoppy on March 26, 2013, 01:47:25 PM
I think you are missing the point! Are you seriously suggesting that TK transmitted power through the air, enough to light his 1kW bank of lamps?

Why does it sound like you don't believe that you can transmit power in the air. Yes heavy loads can be ran from this method. Tesla did it.

In my opinion the tesla coil is much like a load coil in modern antenna. What these do is effectively make the antenna think it is longer while still maintaining it's short length. We could design any length of antenna by using a coil lower in the antenna and we currently do this.

I'm not suggesting that TK used this method. What I am suggesting is that the flow is already there and going. In fact in. Some strange way gravity is tied to this flow and I think this is where Tesla figured out what gravity was.


The TK device channels this flow into it's core via the ground cable. This is the poke in the bottom of the lake and the ground cable is only giving the already established flow a lesser resistance conduit or vacuum source. This also goes back to the container under water analogy that Tesla describes as well. Except the water like material is the energy or charge. What could be easier? The load coil gets induced from the flow going into the ground cable before it gets to the ground cable. Essentially not fulfilling the vacuum and preserving the source. Yes it will have leakage but by and by a lot of real work could be done in this fashion. Tesla harnessed Niagra Falls in this same method. Take an established flow and use it before it gets to it's destination.

what sets this all up is the excitation of the field with the High voltage exciter like emanations from the heavy exciter coil. The load coil is in the center and wrapped around the ground cable to induce it's current before the current gets to it. The bigger the excitation field the more intensifying effect it has on the network and it reaches further into the air towards the vast sea of charges flowing over the surface of our atmosphere.


This flow can be seen from the space station while looking at the auroraborialis.


check this out:  http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=aurora+borealis+from+space&view=detail&mid=9A5ED4A5B366EAB510559A5ED4A5B366EAB51055&first=0&FORM=NVPFVR

you can see the electric field lines going outwards from the surface of our atmosphere. This is our proof and they are lines being intensified by the interaction of the layer between space and our atmosphere and the radiative energy from our sun and space. Those lines are the electric field and just watch some of the videos and you can see it flowing and moving like water. But the lines stay intact and I think are following the lines from our physical planet. I bet those lines connect all the way down to our planet. They are the vehicle that drives all of our phenomena like weather, heat shimmers, storms and even tornadoes or hurricanes. They all attribute lines being twisted. Just think of the density of these lines and you can see that we could harness them to do real work and get huge amounts of power from them.

stivep

C....n
modified

read below and below of below ,and you will know what  I'm referring to :)


The difference is that no transmitter is foreseen as there was conflicting thoughts about influence of transmitter  to create magnetic filed in electromagnets - strong enough to activate the compound.
At frequency of 300MHz magnetic domains in  iron of electromagnets less likely can switch.
Another question comes from  the point of connecting  paralel  resonant circuit to two series electromagnets.
Will the electromagnets react as chockes to HF signal?
So what I did was modification of circuit
Where generator of 200mW is connected to electromagnets using switches at two legs.Than after activation of the compound  switches will be switch to connect DC 10A 110V from  brass ends of the glass tube
as to allow that DC  to energize the electromagnets.


The assumption was that if one uses  original transmitter with the antennas of say 500W RF signal at 300MHz than at the distance of few hundred meters (as suggested in the patent) it still will be about 90 DB of attenuation  or another words signal loss.
Than my concept with  generator connected directly will be easier to tune and equal with power equation comparing to RF










Wesley