Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 155 Guests are viewing this topic.

NickZ

   Other Planet:
  First, I'd like to mentioned that the diagram that you are following was not made by Akula, but was made by someone else, and also, has not been proven or replicated and shown to be an actual working device as such, or verified, one way or another.
  Second, we are not sure that there is any aluminum sheet insert inside of the original Akula device's air coil, as we had assumed previously, nor is there any to be observed in his second device, either.
  Third, that Akula had shown a choke made using 50 turns, of insulated wire, over a non metal former, connected only to a small tuning capacitor, and nothing else. But, later mentioned that a 300 turns choke would work even better.
  I hope this helps.

verpies

Quote from: NickZ on October 19, 2013, 11:55:45 AM
Such as,  if the magical Russian ferrite core is absolutely needed, or not.
I think that the Russian ferrites are not magic. They just represent one of the few chemical compositions in existence.  There are not that many common compositions. Some of them used to be used in the past and not anymore because of their cost.  The user Osiakosia has looked into the composition of the old ferries and contemporary ones.  Just look up his old posts or PM him.

Quote from: NickZ on October 19, 2013, 11:55:45 AM
Does the core really need to be the "special one", or will any work.
I think it just has to be one of the eight compositions in use. 1/8 is not very special.
I think that the size and shape affects its acoustic resonance frequency, AL value and the ampturns it can tolerate, but not much more. Thus, besides the acoustic properties, the core dimensions and shapes are not very critical  - not any more than in regular transformer.

Quote from: NickZ on October 19, 2013, 11:55:45 AM
Does the core need to be insulated between halves, are the clips affecting anything, or  not.
IMO opinion insulation does not matter because these ferrites are not electrically conductive.
The spacing and squeezing does matter in my opinion because it affects the acoustic properties of the ferrite...especially if rattling/clapping is important (e.g. a full toroid cannot do that).

Quote from: NickZ on October 19, 2013, 11:55:45 AM
Already Geo has shown us that yokes are not needed to achieve the same results, that his yoke can obtain, by showing us that the fly-backs will work.
I also think the the conical yoke shape is not necessary. EE, CC or EI cores should work as well. (loose pieces too).
IMO as far as the energy generating effect goes, the core does not have to be ferromagnetic at all and copper or aluminum or brass pipes, rings, disks or springy helical windings, also work as long as they are allowed to ring acoustically at some very special frequencies and magnetic fields.

The author of the patent here was one of the first ones to notice the anomalous energy in inductors and transformers that are vibrated acoustically.

baroutologos

Quote from: FreeEnergyInfo on October 18, 2013, 04:55:03 PM
AKULA0083   SXEMATIC

www.realstrannik.ru/forum/48-temy-freeenergylt-antanasa/129332-ustanovka-akuly-povtorenie.html?start=360#162851

I gave a study of this circuit. It seems its a clever circuit and i think... behaves as a Kacher one but by using FETs in a half bridge topology makes it more efficient. So an efficient, self tuned, duty cycle adjusted circuit for creating an LC resonance... and running the Tesla coil.. right?

How the yoke fits to all? The biffilars? the ground?


ps: I once had assembled a Tesla coil run by a royer oscillator, having the primary with a variable capacitor (pf range) in parallell.
One of the most efficient designs for Tesla coil seen by me. Typically about 50% more efficiently than a Kacher but far easily detuned when abused (touched etc).

I have also run a Tesla coil having istead of a typical primary few turns over a double E ferrite transformer and another winding with a royer oscillator. Runned good but not so effective. I did not strive to perfect it though. The plan was to be like a Tesla magnifier setup. :)
Anyway Tesla coils are at best tools.. not OU in anyway in my experience and others of course.

NickZ

  Verpies:
  Thanks for your detailed replies.
   So, the next two tests could be to see if the use on non round or non conical coils, such as ferrite rods will also work, as I use in the "Ringer" circuits. As well as trying to use non ferrite cores, but still a round shaped toroid air core for the primary coils.
This would eliminate to some degree the idea of ferrite as the gain medium, although copper or other gain mediums may still be present. But, through the elimination, one by one, the process of finding just where the magic lies, may be observed.

  Hoppy:
  Thanks for your results and tests on the output readings of your Royer oscillator. I know how frustrating this all can be.
  However, I don't think that the actual load readings are of real concern, once we can successfully feed-back and self run these devices.  As economizing the circuit, or working towards efficiency is not the goal here. Although its hard to imagine how putting a load on a device can induce it to create 0 input from an input source, as was shown by SR 193. But, it does look like the load becomes part of the circuit, and will not work the same without it.
 
  Geo:
  Maybe try to obtain more Halogen 1kw bulbs, to test for even higher output results, as it may also be possible that the batteries output drawn, may drop even further.
  Again, please show a clear close up picture of your Royer oscillator so that we can try to duplicate your results, by using the same exact components, coils and other details, where possible. Also, are your yoke cores made in Russia, or not? 
I will do my part to follow up on this, as soon as I can. 
  Sorry for all my suggestions, and thanks again for all your great contributions.
  You have been an inspiration to us all.

                                                          NickZ

Acca

 NickZ:  " First, I'd like to mentioned that the diagram that you are following was not made by Akula, but was made by someone else, and also, has not been proven or replicated and shown to be an actual working device as such, or verified, one way or another."

Your comments are not true... link to translated Roman post is below "some of you should follow the links provided and read to understand them"  and maybe stop  moaning and complaining that this is hard... Roman makes his own daigrams as wells his posts here below..   

http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.realstrannik.ru%2Fforum%2F48-temy-freeenergylt-antanasa%2F129332-ustanovka-akuly-povtorenie.html%3Fstart%3D360%23162851&act=url


This is his quote" I just wake up Inexhaustible all sketches by hand type in the programe!"[/font]
Acca..