Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Groundloop]

Sony,

Welcome, we need all the help we can get.

The last translation from xenomorphlabs made sense to me. I'm now able
to lit up one withe LED from my small tesla coil. The LED gets double the
brightness when I connect one wire to the coil to the led, and the other
wire from the led to ground. (I use the kitchen sink as ground.
Water pipes are made of copper.)

It is not much to light just one LED, I know, but it is a start. I shows me that
we indeed can have energy transfer with one wire only, and that the energy
transfer is GREATER when we connects to ground.

Groundloop.

[hartiberlin]

Looks nice groundloop.
Better put 2 LEDs in antiparallel so you see both polarity waves.

Also, Many thanks for the translation of the Tesla-transformer video
to the Russian girlfriend.
Does he say, that the metallic plate standing next to the second coil
is NOT connected to the glowing bulb ?

[jeanna]

Hi everybody,
I did some more research today and found the source of the word "converter".
I will only provide the AC converter part, although if you want me to I can also provide the dc converter part.

Before I begin the quote, I will also give you this quote because I think it is the "punch-out"? from the translation above.

"That is the reason why the rate of change is
very much greater when glass, for instance, is broken through," [he is referring to disruptive discharge breaking through.]

now for the AC converter and the picture follows. ia is the bottom, iia the middle, iiia is the top drawing.

" Besides,
these transformers are expensive to build. It has been found by
experience that it is best to follow the plan illustrated at iiia. [top one]
In this arrangement a rotating transformer g, is employed to
convert the low tension direct currents into low frequency alter-
nating currents, preferably also of small tension. The tension
of the currents is then raised in a stationary transformer T. The
secondary s of this transformer is connected to an adjustable con-
denser c which discharges through the gap or discharger dd, placed
in either of the ways indicated, through the primary p of a dis-
ruptive discharge coil, the high frequency current being obtained
from the secondary s of this coil, as described on previous occa-
sions. This will undoubtedly be found the cheapest and most con-
venient way of converting direct currents.
   The three branches of the circuit A represent the usual cases
met in practice when alternating currents are converted. In
Fig. ib a condenser c., generally of large capacity, is connected to the
circuit L containing the devices L L, m m. The devices m m are sup-
posed to be of high self-induction so as to bring the frequency of
the circuit more or less to that of the dynamo. In this instance
the discharger d d should best have a number of makes and breaks
per second equal to twice the frequency of the dynamo. If not
so, then it should have at least a number equal to a multiple or
even fraction of the dynamo frequency. It should be observed,
referring to ib, that the conversion to a high potential is also
effected when the discharger d d, which is shown in the sketch, is
omitted. But the effects which are produced by currents which
rise instantly to high values, as in a disruptive discharge, are
entirely different from those produced by dynamo currents which
rise and fall harmonically. So, for instance, there might be in a
given case a number of makes and breaks at d d equal to just
twice the frequency of the dynamo, or in other words, there may
be the same number of fundamental oscillations as would be pro-


317

duced without the discharge gap, and there might even not be any
quicker superimposed vibration ; yet the differences of potential at
the various points of the circuit, the impedance and other pheno-
mena, dependent upon the rate of change, will bear no similarity in
the two cases. Thus, when working with currents discharging dis-
ruptively, the element chiefly to be considered is not the frequency,
as a student might be apt to believe, but the rate of change per
unit of time. With low frequencies in a certain measure the same
effects may be obtained as with high frequencies, provided the rate
of change is sufficiently great. So if a low frequency current is
raised to a potential of, say, 75,000 volts, and the high tension cur-
rent passed through a series of high resistance lamp filaments, the
importance of the rarefied gas surrounding the filament is clearly
noted, as will be seen later; or, if a low frequency current of several
thousand amperes is passed through a metal bar, striking phe-
nomena of impedance are observed, just as with currents of high
frequencies. But it is, of course, evident that with low frequency
currents it is impossible to obtain such rates of change per unit of
time as with high frequencies, hence the effects produced by the
latter are much more prominent. It is deemed advisable to
make the preceding remarks, inasmuch as many more recently
described effects have been unwittingly identified with high
frequencies. Frequency alone in reality does not mean anything,
except when an undisturbed harmonic oscillation is considered.
..."
Tesla

thank you,

jeanna

[justasm]

Hi ppl

Does he say, that the metallic plate standing next to the second coil
is NOT connected to the glowing bulb ?

Yes He did

Regards,
Justas

[Groundloop]

All,

I realized that I needed a bigger Tesla coil for testing so I have started
to design a new unit. The design goal is to get approx. 3000 - 5000 volt
output from the blue coil. I'm planning to run the coil from 12 volt DC.
So it will be a solid state design without any spark gap. Still a lot of work
to do. :-)

Groundloop.