Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[bolt]

dont you have google or wiki on your PC?

VARS As a mathematical convenience for engineering design, the nontransfer of power is described as the product of a physically nonexistent (imaginary) current wave that is a quarter out of phase with the actual voltage wave. This nonexistent current is called reactive current because it is normally caused by loads that react to voltage by storing current. When multiplied by voltage, this quantity is called reactive power. It is measured by a quantity called volt-amps-reactive, or VARs.

VARs are mathematically convenient because the apparent power is the vector sum of VARs and Watts. Since VARs and watts are orthogonal, the pythagorean theorem can be used to perform the vector sums or differences. So, as a practical matter, mechanical meters for VARs often calculate the VARs as the square root of VA squared minus Wh squared.

The nature of the electrical load determines whether the voltage and current coincide. If the load is purely resistive, the two quantities become negative and positive at the same time, the direction of energy flow does not reverse, and only real power flows. If the load is purely reactive, then the voltage and current are 90 degrees out of phase and there is no net power flow. A practical load will have resistive, inductive, and capacitive parts, and so both positive and negative real and reactive power will flow to the load.

BTW this is mainstream BS they always tell you VARS is virtual and can never be made real.   But almost all OU systems the power is in VARS. If you put a load straight on like a bulb you get nothing, zero.  If you measure the volts you get plenty but 0 current. if you measure the amps with shunt you get amps.  This is because the Volts have become Joules and the AMPS are a post effect. With pure balanced OU system a 10,000 volts system can yield 10,000 amps yet the coils an wires in around the circuit are stone cold. This is how Don Smith gets 35Kw out of a system that looks like is would melt at 50 watts.

But they are in the wrong domain especially for cold RE without power factor correcting. You look how many people make a tesla transfer coil then say its not doing anything:)

[hartiberlin]

Hi Xenomorph,
on the secondary of TR1 you need first to have High Voltage diodes and then a HV cap
BEFORE the spark gap.

Then at the secondary of TR2 you also need a cap in parallel with TR2 secondary for the right resonance
frequency ( 50 or 400 Hz in Europe)...

Please add these components and try again.
Many thanks for your hard work.

[aether22]

1: Try googling it, see what you get, for me NADA.

2: I figured it had something to do with Volt-Ampere and Power Factor but couldn't pin it down.

Ok, well the term seems to slightly obscure the reality, an ideal inductive or capacitive load pulls energy from the source and gives energy back at different parts of the cycle, this isn't so mysterious.

If these components are ideal they aren't using any net power.

dont you have google or wiki on your PC?

VARS As a mathematical convenience for engineering design, the nontransfer of power

Ah, but of course power IS being transferred, it is merely being returned.
At any instance in time however power is either being given to or taken from the reactive component.

is described as the product of a physically nonexistent (imaginary) current wave that is a quarter out of phase with the actual voltage wave.

Show me a reactive circuit that doesn't have a measurible current.

This nonexistent current is called reactive current because it is normally caused by loads that react to voltage by storing current. When multiplied by voltage, this quantity is called reactive power. It is measured by a quantity called volt-amps-reactive, or VARs.

If you have a perfect tank circuit you could put in a great deal of energy into this reactive circuit, a very measurable current and voltage would exist and be available.
The fact that you have no resistive element does not make this energy imaginary in the same way that the energy contained in a kid on a swing isn't imaginary.

Sure the way the inductor and capacitor works does make the voltage across and current through them 90 degrees out of phase but this doesnot make their current imaginary or unusable, however there is a catch, much like getting hit by the kid on the swing the energy can only be used once and all the confusion these abstract terms generate doesn't turn circulating untapped energy into continuously usable power.

VARs are mathematically convenient because the apparent power is the vector sum of VARs and Watts. Since VARs and watts are orthogonal, the pythagorean theorem can be used to perform the vector sums or differences. So, as a practical matter, mechanical meters for VARs often calculate the VARs as the square root of VA squared minus Wh squared.

The nature of the electrical load determines whether the voltage and current coincide. If the load is purely resistive, the two quantities become negative and positive at the same time, the direction of energy flow does not reverse, and only real power flows. If the load is purely reactive, then the voltage and current are 90 degrees out of phase and there is no net power flow. A practical load will have resistive, inductive, and capacitive parts, and so both positive and negative real and reactive power will flow to the load.

BTW this is mainstream BS they always tell you VARS is virtual and can never be made real.   But almost all OU systems the power is in VARS. If you put a load straight on like a bulb you get nothing, zero.  If you measure the volts you get plenty but 0 current. if you measure the amps with shunt you get amps.  This is because the Volts have become Joules and the AMPS are a post effect. With pure balanced OU system a 10,000 volts system can yield 10,000 amps yet the coils an wires in around the circuit are stone cold. This is how Don Smith gets 35Kw out of a system that looks like is would melt at 50 watts.

But they are in the wrong domain especially for cold RE without power factor correcting. You look how many people make a tesla transfer coil then say its not doing anything:)

Don Smith has claimed far more than anyone before but has AFAIK less verifiable evidence than any other well known FE inventor.

Also it is worth noting that Don's explanations seem to have shifted.
He has talked about pulling in or copying fields / energy / magnetism and he has talked about this power factor correction.

Personally I can make far more sense of the idea pulling in or copying flux than trying to confuse myself with power factor correction.

I would view it as though the tank circuit is there either as a flux source to induce energy into another part of the circuit (that copies/pulls in it's flux or if you like turns it's virtual power into real power) or as an energy sucking antenna (under the theory that you can induce reception by simulating the reception of a wave).

This is my theory and I have a fair accumulation of evidence to show it, by chance Don Smith has claimed similar.

BTW I was messing around with a home built Tesla Coil the other day and there is indication of it picking up and outputting something of a far far lower frequency out of the secondary than it has any right to, ask if curious.

[hartiberlin]

@Xenomorph,
at which point do you have hooked up your ground wire ?

[lltfdaniel1]

Radiant energy is NOT radio signals. Therefore these circuits that are gloried amplified crystal sets tuned in to BBC world on short wave with 100ft antenna are nothing to do with radiant energy systems. Sure you might get back 5 volts at 5 milliamps but that is not an RE system.


RE is RF as energized field excites local electrons in air, ground, space and returns magnetic flux.

As Don Smith says "the electricity you pay for is simply a signature copy from the generating plant to move your electrons in your house! They did NOT travel from the power plant." Please remember this because electrons are everywhere already you only have to learn how to move them using volts and when they return to natural place current will flow as an AFTER effect IF required for free. Volts are Joules and they become watts later if a load is applied which allows electrons to flow back to the air or ground or wherever they came from.

Not me speaking or Don Smith Tesla knew this 100 years ago.

It goes on about RF Energy Resonance on Ionograms which of course is the ionosphere about how possibly tesla did it in his day and to give a much more clearer picture on how moray did it and how the ionosphere can reflect rf waves and have a ripple resonate effect along with morays rf - re.

PRIMING the device consisted of stroking the iron core in the resonant circuit with a strong magnet. The stroking and TUNING of the resonant circuit continued as long as 5 to 10 minutes, "then" the switch was closed and the lights obtained power. When the antenna or ground wire was momentarily opened and closed the lights would go out and then return, if the re-closure was soon enough. If there was a delay before the re-closure, the lights would not come back on without re-priming.
    It seems clear that the priming and tuning was establishing resonance with the ionosphere.

Again with harmonics..we are obviously dealing with rf-re and that deals with the earth like i said before and like harmonics it is in harmony.

So then again meet Resonance ionosphere just to add substance to people who did not know to get a better idea.



I knew of my error about RE anyways..

Sure you learn to walk study crystal sets and then you learn to run and hit the jackpot.

I certainly would not dismiss the resonance effect regarding the circuit and the ionosphere.

Anyhow..Knowing the aether and i have read somewhere that it is also called dark energy..and that there needs to be a lot more infomation about but if people want to read this..it will give a good detailed insight regarding aether/zpe.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/10316855/Magnetic-Resonant-Amplifier