Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 275 Guests are viewing this topic.

xee2

@ Yucca

Can you please post any information on your flyback transformer label. Such as part number and manufacturer. And maybe a photo.

You seem to be getting excellent results. I tried using a 555 timer driving a flyback years ago but did not get anywhere near the voltage out that you are getting. I think the difference is getting a good transformer.

Using it as a feedback oscillator is also probably a better approach than the 555 timer.



Yucca

Quote from: xee2 on August 02, 2009, 09:57:07 AM
@ Yucca

Can you please post any information on your flyback transformer label. Such as part number and manufacturer. And maybe a photo.

You seem to be getting excellent results. I tried using a 555 timer driving a flyback years ago but did not get anywhere near the voltage out that you are getting. I think the difference is getting a good transformer.

Using it as a feedback oscillator is also probably a better approach than the 555 timer.

Hi xee2,

With this same flyback I was firing using a FET gated with a pulseing circuit. The results I got were terrible compared to the transistor oscillator circuit I now have.

The transformer was from a 20inch colour set, the label on it says this:

FCM-2015AL
2859-136-010
SAMSUNG GAb

One thing I have discovered is that the dual rail toroidal power input choke is essential for efficient operation, it seems to slow the switching just enough so that the transisior stays cool. When I bypass the input choke the transistor gets very hot and the current draw goes up for the same achieved spark gap. Also I tried a big electrolytic after the choke thinking I could increase instantaneous current, it did just that, the spark sounded more aggresive but again the fast switching in the diode caused much heating and less overall efficiency. So my tip is use 10...20 turn bifilar input choke as per my diagram.

P.S.
I think you will get good results with any old flyback using this circuit, as I said when I pulsed the flyback using 555 equivalent it was much weaker and took more input power.

xee2

@ Yucca

Thanks for the info. It is much appreciated.

EDIT: This should be a photo of your flyback,
http://www.nedis.com/Articles/HR%20Diemen/HR7477.php


sparks

    If two resonant circuits are coupled via a spark gap or similar device would it be possible to store hf input from a scource in the first resonant circuit and once the oscillations are at a high power level dump them into the low frequency tank.  Below is a cryptic diagram of a circuit Tesla used.  The input stage a series resonant circuit and the output a tank.  The spark gap conveying power to the tank from the input when the tank emf falls below the input stage capacitor voltage.  This input would be invisible to the lf tank inductor but the capacitor would gobble it up.  The next cap charge would go to a higher level from the input energy.  The lf being amplified by the addition of the hf bias gain on the capacitor. Now all that is needed is a large antennae to capture alot of decibels from a yet to be identified scource of hf emwaves. :P
Think Legacy
A spark gap is cold cold cold
Space is a hot hot liquid
Spread the Love

Yucca

Quote from: sparks on August 02, 2009, 01:18:43 PM
    If two resonant circuits are coupled via a spark gap or similar device would it be possible to store hf input from a scource in the first resonant circuit and once the oscillations are at a high power level dump them into the low frequency tank.  Below is a cryptic diagram of a circuit Tesla used.  The input stage a series resonant circuit and the output a tank.  The spark gap conveying power to the tank from the input when the tank emf falls below the input stage capacitor voltage.  This input would be invisible to the lf tank inductor but the capacitor would gobble it up.  The next cap charge would go to a higher level from the input energy.  The lf being amplified by the addition of the hf bias gain on the capacitor. Now all that is needed is a large antennae to capture alot of decibels from a yet to be identified scource of hf emwaves. :P

Sounds good Sparks, nothing is free as you said with "a yet to be identified source", but maybe as you say these device types can tap into something that is all around us and can only be harvested at extremely high Z. then the device downconverts into something useable. I can't wait for my mag wire to arrive! :)