Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[woopy]

Hi all

the rain stopped shortly , and could not prevent me to have a second test.

Took all precaution as per Stefan

and 3,2,1 go

yaouuh it works very fine

The bank directly connected to the grid does simply no light at all, but with the Kapagen it is near full brightness.

i have AC current , no cap at all.

I did not make any measure but the grid fuse did not even break.

another thing i have a radio on at 10 meters from the kapagen and nothing , no grrrrrbbrrkkkkkk, at all in the radio.

OK and the rain comes again

hope that tomorrow it will be better weather to make some measurements.

just for info the bank as a resistance of 400 ohm.

when i connect the bank to the grid, my clampmeter shows 130 ma at 230 volts AC

just another thing the bank was on  and stopped only when i switched off.
but when i tried to take the measre of resistance it was impossible. Than i checked the bulb and one was broken. I mean it seems that i probably had the arc in the bulb which make the bulb on even if the tungsten filament is broken. What do you think?

good luck at all

Laurent

[leo48]

when i connect the bank to the grid, my clampmeter shows 130 ma at 230 volts AC

30Watt only for 100W lamps 10 each, congratulations for the results as well.
Leo48

[What_The_Flux]

I'm going to take an entirely new tack on this endeavor. I'm going to try to engineer it the way the inventors tell us to. They make it very clear that a precisely tuned device is essential to getting this effect.
Read the patents.
Read the words of Kapanadze and Smith (again).

Not to take anything away from the current experiments, but I think many of you may be misleading yourself thinking you are approaching OU. Remember, light bulbs are rated 100W because that's what they consume at 50-60 Hz. They can be lit using much less power at high frequency. I can't give you exact data but if we had 100KHz power in our houses, the same bulb might need only 10 watts. This is the problem I have with JL Naudin getting everyone excited. If you want to truly compare apples to apples, convert the output back to 50/60 Hz, isolate it from any HV/HF and measure it.

That said, this is how my experiment goes:
I'm ordering an NST which I know outputs 20KHz. So my first step, before I make sparks and light bulbs, is to design my coils according to the way the people claiming success say they should be.
They say LOUDLY that you must tune your coil to the same frequency (or a harmonic) that your spark or HV signal is at. To do that I have to know my L and C.

I started by winding my secondary on the tube since that's the biggest one. I'll later tune the primary to the same frequency. I have 190 turns of wire at a diameter of 1 15/16" and a length of 11.0". Using the formulas Don Smith puts in the literature linked elsewhere in this thread, I can ballpark the inductance at 285uH. Using the resonance formula, I know I'll need a C of about .22uF to get resonance at 20KHz. See how easy that was? Now I have an idea what the right values are for my circuit.

So I breadboarded a 556 timer set to about 20KHz with a variable pot (added a darlington for some drive) and ran that into an RC tank with my coil and about .22uF worth of capacitors. (see circuit).
I changed the freq on the 556 until I saw a peak in the output. At resonance the resistance of the tank is very high, and that will be my max amplitude. (first scope pic is non resonance, second scope pic is in resonance) On first pass I saw on my scope a period of about 44uS. I adjusted the capacitance until I get the desired 50uS period. On my meter I double checked the three caps I had hooked up and they are .15+.035+.03 = .215uF. Pretty darn close to the .22 I was predicting!

Next step is to wind my primary, and match the resonance on that side too.
But for now, off to play golf in 92 degree heat.

RING THE BELL, DAMMIT!

[forest]

"Ring Bell Twice" or maybe "Bell rings Twice" ?

[xenomorphlabs]

What_The_Flux:

Check the thread http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7837.0
In particular Peterea and Yucca´s set-ups, which have already experimented in the direction that you are going.

What i don´t understand is ,why you want to divert the experimenters from this thread away from what they are doing and into the Don Smith direction. Especially since they are seeing promising results.
Your approach is very scientific and i wish you good luck in further experimenting.