Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[xenomorphlabs]

I'm going to say it sure looks a lot like a 556 dual timer chip but then I don't read Russian well so can't say for sure.

@ e2matrix: Why do you only extract half the info out of individual posts?

Or maybe you have not checked the energetic forum after you posted there.

It was already posted what that chip is right before the datasheet info:

Chip you are referring to is not 555.
It is russian chip called к561лн2 which is Hex Inverting Buffer,
you can buy here : КупиÑ,ÑŒ МикросÑ...ема К561ЛН2

Datasheet:
http://radio-hobby.org/uploads/datasheets/k/k561ln2.pdf

If you use Crazy-Alex winding directions you won´t see much out of this.
I have wound several different coils and this did not couple too well.
Not sure if it´s because of a certain ferrite permeability which is more advantageous.
I guess no one here can report a different result?

[grizli]

D'Arvosal coil

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyY4WgSYIKI

[Pirate88179]

@ e2matrix:

Please post attachments no larger than 800 x 600 or it messes up the page width.  I have re-sized it.

Thanks,

Bill

[the_big_m_in_ok]

@ e2matrix:
Please post attachments no larger than 800 x 600 or it messes up the page width.  I have re-sized it.
Thanks,
Bill

@all
A tip?
I was able to take the original drawing, before Pirate88179 resized it, and set the page parameters to sideways 'landscape' and then reduce all four margins to .1 " so it printed on the page all at once.

Either Pirate's or my way would work if your page print settings will allow it.

--Lee

[e2matrix]

@ e2matrix: Why do you only extract half the info out of individual posts?

Or maybe you have not checked the energetic forum after you posted there.

It was already posted what that chip is right before the datasheet info:

If you use Crazy-Alex winding directions you won´t see much out of this.
I have wound several different coils and this did not couple too well.
Not sure if it´s because of a certain ferrite permeability which is more advantageous.
I guess no one here can report a different result?

Yep I just posted here before checking back there only to realize later there was more info.  Sorry - just posted what seemed relevant and wondered if anyone here knew more about that translated schematic.  Thanks for the info.