Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 334 Guests are viewing this topic.

core

Got a question. How many people have heard that Tesla's 'Ozone' generator patent has something to do with free energy.

Respectfully,

Core

dllabarre

Quote from: core on February 18, 2011, 06:33:42 PM
Got a question. How many people have heard that Tesla's 'Ozone' generator patent has something to do with free energy.

Respectfully,

Core

I have....

DonL

Pirate88179

Quote from: LtBolo on February 18, 2011, 12:01:26 PM
Pondering a bit more...

The spark gap is an electron accelerator, which in my mind makes it capable of harnessing quantum energy.



LTBolo:

Forgive my ignorance but don't electrons always move at the speed of light?  Is so, how can they be accelerated to any speed beyond that?  I thought that was nature's speed limit.  Now, I know about the particle accelerators they have built and are building but I think that is something different.

I do not know enough about quantum mechanics to argue anything with anyone...I am just wondering if what I was taught is correct or not, and if not why?

@ All:

We want to know what was/is in the green box.  What about the video with the unit in the Plexiglas case, which appeared to be a more marketable version of this device.  Would the components from the green box not be in that clear plastic case as well?  Or was there another "Green box" off camera somewhere with the vital components in it?  I will have to view that video again to refresh my memory.

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

wattsup

Quote from: core on February 18, 2011, 06:33:42 PM
Got a question. How many people have heard that Tesla's 'Ozone' generator patent has something to do with free energy.
Respectfully,
Core

Hallelujah brothers. That was one of the posts I had prepared but did not put up.

You see, we had a local guy of TKs that we translated here, with thanks again, and he mentioned seeing a second spark gap in a coil. Wow two spark gaps.

Hmmmmmm. The Tesla Ozone Patent (TOP) is exactly doing that. You have a direct short contact over the battery or feed supply that creates sparks. I know. Then the outcome is a working circuit that creates what we call today as a corona discharge that creates another spark producing ozone gas. @erfinder once said about this "who said you only have to produce ozone".

If the inverter output was rectified by the GB to hold charge on a capacitor bank, then the bank becomes the real feed and also the real point of return from inside the green box itself. The output TK was feeding back when he removed the battery was just to keep the inverter going, but once the device is going, the OU is in the Green Box and the inverter load is reduced to a minimum, so the return to the inverter input side is possible via the bulb potential and the bulbs did not go down in brightness because the inverter only needs a small amount. What the device cannot do is start up from its internal capacitor bank because the start up watts is too high hence he needs a battery to start it.

During the TOP trials we did, the main problem was the make/break off the direct feed source. Relays would not last long. Transistors would quickly just fizz out because you are developing strong forces in two directions. On the break, then on the make, each one produces an opposite directionality but each one is a real hit. You really needed to make a rotary switching system as shown in the TOP to have any chances of developing strong "damped waves". What I think is that TK found a way to use a second spark gap as the make/break off a polarized capacitor bank. So there is a spark gap that feeds a primary and the secondary of the primary feeds a second spark gap that feeds the bulbs. The TK coil is just there to act like a slight sink, but even then I doubt it had any major use.

Using damped wave like in the TOP ensures that from each feed impulse received via the cap bank, most of it is return back to the cap bank, plus the first spark gap hits the primary of the working circuit that then produces a second spark gap that works the bulbs. The main idea is to recirculate the initial feed supply from the first capacitor bank.

There is no way in hell that you can equate the TK coil with a Tesla coil. They are totally different animals. Now you can postulate for 100 years on all the energy influences from the ether etc., but if ether wanted to inject itself into those coils, then there should be thousands of coils out there with the same build that are doing the same thing, but they are not.

wattsup

Magluvin

Hey Core

I have also.  And it is very similar to the Tesla Pat   Igniter For Gasoline Engines.

It uses a large inductance , as you did, to charge a cap and then discharge the cap into a primary.
Virtually the same circuit. The circuit is genius as to having 1 switch that does 2 functions. Allows the charging of the cap And the discharge to the primary.  Tesla says that it is more efficient this way compared to driving the primary directly as seen in modern ignition systems. This may be interpreted as OU, but it just may be more eff.  Im still working on these things.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwWhaEPygp8
Mags