Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[leo48]

This is original link:
http://www.youtube.com/embed/iFP8zu6TdvI
Thanks for translate
Leo48

[wattsup]

Translation by Google on the core:
About the core.
Assistant Tariel nick tarielkapanadze, one of the forums on the question: "Is there a ferrite-to-install" replied ambiguously:
"Ferrites in the Tesla transformer is not used, and this one does not argue! really stupid to use ferrites in the Tesla transformer. But any sane person who knows or electrical work in the electric department, says that it is impossible to transform this power without the magnetic circuit at this frequency (50 Hz), yes, I'm not arguing that we can do without a magnetic core, but then the installation should work at high frequency and judging by the implementation of the coils are physically unable to convert this amount of energy at high frequency, since it is fraught with enormous challenges and the material (PVC tape) just break out, and the same applies to the power cable. It is therefore reasonable to assume that the magnetic circuit is simply obliged to be present in a removable coil.

Hallelujah "simply obliged to be present in a removable coil". That says it all indeed. The TK coil is simply a decoy or your main show-and-tell piece. For an artichect, he would call it his main focal point. Or a useful one coil tank. Come on guys, you have to understand that regardless of what you say, coupling is coupling and those coils can never transfer all the juice from one coil set to another. The wires are wrong, the insulation is wrong, the winding numbers are wrong. This means the OU is in the Green Box and that can now be left to all forms of imagination to figure it out. But from our recent friend, again saying there is a second spark gap inside a coil, well just check my third to last post.

If the Tesla Ozone Patent (TOP) can be accomplished using a spark gap as the make break, then the working circuit (wc) primary gets the hit two times per pulse plus you get maximum energy returning to the source. Those two transistors would only be required to return flyback to source which would simply be a small 220vac capacitor bank. The wc secondary becomes high voltage/amp source as the second spark gap as seen on the GB, paralleled by the load via the TK coil.

The inverter can be used or not but at that scale, it is an easy solution for returned output.

So what would such a circuit look like is what I have been breaking my head on. How can I design a TOP with a spark gap as the make break. It means you have to start high voltage in the first stage. But the first stage of TOP requires one coil of high inductance. What is the change, if any, if the voltages used in the first stage are high enough to generate a spark gap at make/break, relative to the coil of high inductance, the capacitor and working transformer primary that has to also be in the same loop? If you put the output of a flyback transformer as the feed to the TOP, imagine the output generated by the working primary to secondary.

Hmmmmm. In the Plexi unit we see two main coils. One looks like the TK coil is smaller version that is probably again removable to show peolpe. The other coil has one first wind, then two coils, one at each end of the first coil. Two coils could indicate pick-up coils and the one coil could be receiving AC input or vise versa.

The first rule of OU devices is to return the maximum feed energy back to its source. The TOP method does just that plus it gives two pulses per cycle, doubling the effective reaction potential. We did many TOP tests, but we never looked at using a spark as the make/break. So we learn something everyday.

wattsup

PS1: I see @QT pie has stepped out. It is not OK for him to treat everyone that disagrees with him, as a troll. I admit, his roughskin style is useful, but he does not some socializing skills. lol

PS2: No ferrites in the TK coil because there is no coupling in the TK coil.

[wattsup]

Posted by error - Sorry.

[xenomorphlabs]

The wc secondary becomes high voltage/amp source as the second spark gap as seen on the GB, paralleled by the load via the TK coil.

Would it be possible for you to make a screenshot of the GB video in which you see TWO spark gaps?
Thank you

[wattsup]

Would it be possible for you to make a screenshot of the GB video in which you see TWO spark gaps?
Thank you

@xenomorphlabs

A local person that knew TK is the one who indicated that while he lived near him during those times, he had noticed that the device had not only a spark gap on the outside, but also a spark gap inside a coil. There is no possibility to actually grab an image of it with the videos otherwise I would have done that long ago.

But, imagine a first spark gap with a coil around it. That coil could be used for either of two main usages The first as a pick-up to signal the transistor bases to deviate flyback. The second is as a quenching field by simply taking the coil and adding a polarized capacitor of I'd say 100-300uf and a diode all in an isolated series loop. The energy from the spark will enter the coil and the capacitor will keep the coil more and more energized to create a magnetic return flux over the spark gap. The effect may increase the sparks amplitude (punch) without raising feed amplitude to the spark gap itself. All these can be tested as side experiments.

The thing is this, like with many other devices we see. There are just some great ways to go with it, but they are great only if they directly apply to the device as closely as possible. All based on logical and pertinent observations and deductions from the physical evidence.

Guys like @QT come in with this flux thing and show a Los Alamos coil who's build has no likeness at all to the TK coil, and then they say, "this is what it is". It is obvious from his Los Alamos photo that those wires are mag wire specifically designed for close coupling as any would be required for that function. So then if the TK coil is the same, why are its wires not close coupled? When it does not make simple sense, it is usually wrong. But you can still still believe.

Anyways, hope this information will help some of the builders. Maybe someone with some better EE smarts then me can work out a TOP circuit diagram.

If I was not so busy with my present experimenting, I would fall on this. But guys with builds already on the bench may want to consider this if someone can make a logical schematic as a starting point. If someone is interested, I can always provide a logical step by step explanation, but I do not have circuit smarts to put it in a real diagram.

wattsup