Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[FreeEnergyInfo]

AIDAS ...
www.freeenergylt.narod2.ru/aidas2/

[Alena]

@wattsup,


thank you. You are expressing what I have been wondering and pondering about.
I do not know if my last post is of relevance but a hv-transformer with clear specifications is needed in the first place before we then can build and test properly.

I think wesly willl pickup most of the things described here and we have to give some time so he is able to catch up with this one.

However I know from past developments it can be of fatal consequence if you rely on a specific electronic part ( russian flyback in this case) which is not available any longer. It might cause a full-stop in further development aside from a lost possibility to be replicated by others.

Regards

Kator01

Hello
I'm Russian, and English is almost none. Please forgive me the error of translation.


I think that your fears are vain lowercase transformers. Obviously, we are important parameters - frequency, voltage. And we can reach them at any lower case transformer. With sufficiently large secondary winding. The quality of iron from Western transformers above. Consequently, the parameters of it are able to provide. Enough to find a good secondary housing. This is usually in the old black and white tube TVs. That do not use a voltage multiplier.

More important to us as follows. Ratio of frequencies and phases of primary and secondary circuit. That is, row of the transformer and transformer-caduceus. It is their right interaction can create the conditions necessary to us.

We need to determine the mode. Catch it.

[John M]

My interpretation on this schematic starting at T3 HV transformer. D1 and D2 rectify high voltage building up charge on C19. Charge builds up until breakdown of spark gap. C1 and CC form a tank circuit, although CC inductance is self cancelled. There is always some inductance available in the tank circuit causing high frequency oscillations to occur probably at bursts when spark gap fires. The oscillations are picked up on the secondary which has one coil which is wound in opposing directions from center. Don Smith stated that this coil arrangement causes the electrons to spin in opposite directions from the center. One side having voltage and the other side having current. Supposedly when the field collapses the voltage and current combine into the center of the coil causing useful power. In the diagram the power is taken off the center tap and end of one coil rectified through D3 to build up a charge across C26. Breakdown occurs across the second spark gap providing power to the load.
One side of the load feeds back to a coil in the T3 transformer.
Could this be a positive feedback loop?

If for sure you know I am not correct, please comment since I don't want to mislead anyone.

John

[John M]

?

[Alena]

One side of the load feeds back to a coil in the T3 transformer.
Could this be a positive feedback loop?

If for sure you know I am not correct, please comment since I don't want to mislead anyone.

John

This is a very logical and plausible.
However, positive feedback should be dosed at the right time. And the chance to catch this mode is unlikely. We need to clearly present when and what should happen.
It turns out that the system behaves like a whirligig. Moreover, whirligig has unbalanced mass. As skaters folded hands and strengthen the rotation. So. That is the system itself accelerates, until the breakdown of the discharge gap. This assumption.

Obviously, if it enters the bar with a magnetic field of the primary winding is tightening occurs? Maybe it Kapanadze, in his patent, called rhythmic stabilization?

The second figure shows the approximate trace of the process (as obtained on the basis of arguments).  If I have grossly mistaken, please correct me.

Probably, I still believe, a similar pattern would occur if the secondary circuit was closed. But we have an open circuit. What can change the picture.
However, the essence of the process does not change.