Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[bass]

People are amazing creatures. They were told that "it works"  they are looking for how it works. They were told that "it does not work" they stop to looking for. 

[27Bubba]

"WOW, MagnaCoaster has finally shipped out a bunch of orders.  How about that.  I mean 4 years to get the "kinks" out.  Or they were buys shitty Chinese parts. They are using huge magnets and specially positioned coils, using Quantum Tunneling effects for the power increase. "

Give a year, and then look for the feedback. The real truth will come out eventually..

[Jack Noskills]

I think I have figured it out, how to take power from tank circuit without destroying resonance. First we need to understand why resonance is destroyed in a trafo when power is taken. Most of you know the answer to this question, secondary induces energy to primary (back EMF) which causes inductance to change which in turn moves system out of steady state/resonance and more current will flow. Utkin explains how shorting a secondary has no effect on primary side and it is true, but you need to have high freqency so less wire is needed for coil and DC resistance is zero. All power circulating when secondary is shorted but the second you put the power through resistance balance is destroyed.

So this fact made me think that solution is to create a second back EMF that is the exact opposite of the first one. When they meet in the primary they will cancel each other out and resonance is not destroyed. Reactive power into real power. There needs to be two primaries and two secondaries, so atleast two cores are needed. First primary is CW in first core and second primary is CCW in second core, secondaries can be what ever. Their poles need to be connected correctly so that output power does not cancel. I have stuff available and I can do some high frequency experiments to seek for resonance easily.

I have done three core test using grid almost a year ago, and I was able to get 200 watts out using 100 watts but it was too low power and it did not have resonance. But before going into new experiments, I want to ask what do you think about the idea in general ? Has anyone done any experiments like this ?

Anyone laughing yet, lol ? Sparks will ruin this as cancellation needs to be exact, so don't think this has anything to do with TK.

[forest]

I think I have figured it out, how to take power from tank circuit without destroying resonance. First we need to understand why resonance is destroyed in a trafo when power is taken. Most of you know the answer to this question, secondary induces energy to primary (back EMF) which causes inductance to change which in turn moves system out of steady state/resonance and more current will flow. Utkin explains how shorting a secondary has no effect on primary side and it is true, but you need to have high freqency so less wire is needed for coil and DC resistance is zero. All power circulating when secondary is shorted but the second you put the power through resistance balance is destroyed.

So this fact made me think that solution is to create a second back EMF that is the exact opposite of the first one. When they meet in the primary they will cancel each other out and resonance is not destroyed. Reactive power into real power. There needs to be two primaries and two secondaries, so atleast two cores are needed. First primary is CW in first core and second primary is CCW in second core, secondaries can be what ever. Their poles need to be connected correctly so that output power does not cancel. I have stuff available and I can do some high frequency experiments to seek for resonance easily.

I have done three core test using grid almost a year ago, and I was able to get 200 watts out using 100 watts but it was too low power and it did not have resonance. But before going into new experiments, I want to ask what do you think about the idea in general ? Has anyone done any experiments like this ?

Anyone laughing yet, lol ? Sparks will ruin this as cancellation needs to be exact, so don't think this has anything to do with TK.

Jack oh Jack.... Now you know. It's all because of Lenz law which is magnetic interaction. If we imagine magnetic fields like magnets there is very hard to set, position when all magnetic fields are counteracted and there is no resistance to movement... The setup/ embodiment can be various shaped. Working on slightly different setup  right now....

[sparks]

  Tesla did patent a power distribution scheme that I find interesting.   Basically the plan was to excite local tank circuits where the inductance was a stepdown transformer and in parallel with a capacitor.  The input to the tank was from a high voltage power scource.  The load was fed from the ringdown of the local tanks which were set into oscillation by low duty cycle high voltage pulses back at the power scource.  This is a really confusing patent as he mentions that a return wire is not shown yet the power scource capacitor is connected to the load tank via two conductors interrupted by a spark gap.  I believe Tesla used his spark gaps as variable capactiors more than actual conductors.  As the plasma grows from each contact it is like a moving set of points getting closer  or screwing the plates together on the variable capacitors you find in old radio receivers.  The plasma still carrys the charge state of the load and line circuits but the electric field emanating from the plasma leader starts effecting the load and line circuits without actual current bridging the contacts.