Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[jbignes5]

That is such bullshit!

As switches, both of these electronic components can block voltage or conduct current. The difference is only in the type of charge carriers that they use.
Just because vacuum tubes are generally rated for higher blocking voltage and semiconductors are rated for higher conduction currents does not mean that one "works" with voltage and the other with current.

Stop worshiping high voltage and Tesla!
The whole world switched to semiconductors because the have smaller conduction resistance (among other benefits) needed for most applications - this is not a conspiracy.

For someone with very little idea whats the difference between a transistor and tube you are the one worshipping something.

There is a very big difference between a vacuum tube and silicon. Yes they both switch but it is the method of swtching that is the key. One involves matter (silicon) and the other involves vacuum in a space enveloped by glass. Although both results are simular they are vastly different in how they get to that result.

In my years in working with the Citizen Band radio this fact was true: Tubes equalled a better radio. It had better sound and fidelity. When silicon started to pervade the CB world it lost it's fidelity. The low end was missing.

Anyways if giving credit to someone who started all of our electronics world is hero worship then so be it. Tesla is the father of AC and a lot more, get used to it. Ignoring someone who won so many accolades in his life is like ignoring the professor in school.

So this is what I'm gonna do Wasabi, Your ignored from now on. Go blow smoke up someone elses thread. There is a clear difference between tubes and silicon in the way they get to the same end. One uses current to control the current flow (silicon) and one uses voltage to control the current (tubes). Lets look at what they are saying now about tubes: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/05/24/nanoscale-vacuum-transistors-way-cool-but-still-not-as-pretty-as-a-glowing-12au6/

In particular read this excerpt:
"But transistors weren't better in all respects. Electrons move more slowly in a solid than in a vacuum, which means transistors are generally slower than vacuum tubes; as a result, computing isn't as quick as it could be. What's more, semiconductors are susceptible to strong radiation, which can disrupt the atomic structure of the silicon such that the charges no longer move properly. That's a big problem for the military and NASA, which need their technology to work in radiation-harsh environments such as outer space."

in another resource it says this:

"The vacuum tube is a voltage-controlled device, which means that the relationship between the input and output circuits is determined by a transconductance function. The solid-state device most closely analogous to the vacuum tube is the JFET, although the vacuum tube typically operates at far higher voltage (and power) levels than the JFET."


So why don't you stop worshiping your hero the transistor and start learning whats the real truth.

[Hoppy]

A blurry type of thyristor.

The best match I could find is the Soviet T160.

BTW: In front of the four thyristors there are two capacitors on the table connected with a cable. Interesting.

That's a big bugger! See: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Soviet-THYRISTOR-T160-10-112-ALUMINIUM-RADIATOR-1000V-160A-NEW-MILITARY-/350508947672

How would you use this in your Kapanadze type setup and what do you find interesting about the two caps on the table?

[Zeitmaschine]

How would you use this in your Kapanadze type setup and what do you find interesting about the two caps on the table?

Because of this:

[verpies]

Is there a diagram of the yoke device that can be downloaded?

Do you mean this?

Off the top of my mind:
W1 - 50 turns of 18AWG wire (over the same core half as W2 and W3)
W2 - 15 turns of wire (over the same core half as W1 and W3)
W3 - Copper strip (0.5mm thick) 1 perpendicular turn around one-half of the core (insulated from the core, as wide as will fit snuggly)
W4 - 150 turns of bifilar winding (not over the same core half as W1/W2/W3)

HF: 300kHz - 2MHz (suspected dependency on DC-offset @ LF/W2), 10V_P-P, 250mA sinewave or sawtooth waveform
LF: 45Hz - 55Hz 10V_P-P, 250mA sinewave waveform, with adjustable DC-offset
HF to LF frequency ratio: Integer (most likely)
HF to LF phase relationship: Unknown (most likely fixed)
W1 to W3 phase relationship: Unknown (suspected 90 degrees)
C1: Capacitance adjusted to form LC resonance frequency with W3 equal to the HF frequency
C2: Unknown.
Load: Mostly resistive (150W incandescent light bulb)

Note: Alternatively HV short nanopulses can be applied at W3 (without C1) for kW power output at W4.

I would appreciate any corrections to the above...

[wasabi]

One involves matter (silicon) and the other involves vacuum in a space enveloped by glass.

That's why I wrote "The difference is only in the type of charge carriers that they use."  Read more carefully next time.
BTW: Vacuum is not the charge carrier in tubes - free electrons are.

P.S.
It is not my purpose to repair your loose mind. My purpose is to protect others from the misleading information that you sow.