Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[zcsaba77]

Another dry theory (don't know how to get it wet):
Two capacitors each 1µF are connected in parallel and charged with 10 volts. When connected in series the voltage doubles to 20 volts but the capacitance is quartered to 0.5µF, therefore the stored energy stays the same. Now disconnect the capacitors so the capacitance of each would be 1µF at 10 volts. Then take the 10 volts of the second capacitor and add it to the 10 volts of the first capacitor so the first one is now 1µF at 20 volts. Then this capacitor would contain twice the initial energy.
2µF at 10V = 100µ Joules (parallel), 0.5µF at 20V = 100µ Joules (series), but 1µF at 20V = 200µ Joules
Now how to transfer a voltage from one capacitor to a second capacitor in a way that the voltage sum up (without losses)?
Any great ideas?

This is principles Tesla Switch (charge two paralely joined capacitors/batteries with serialy joined capacitors/batteries and switch to back more hundred times in one second) some guys replicated this stuff

[jbignes5]

I thank you for your rather curt responce to my question, but will leave the Cocoa to those that need it!!  I studied the text and have drawn a conclusion that there are many discrepancies with the transformer, in relation to the one described by Tesla. The most important one being, made with an Iron rod core. Surely that is going to have a detrimental effect on the frequency?

So with this in mind I am going to persue Tesla's described construction.

Any way, wire for the secondary winding on order. Drawings for the Nylon parts at the plastics company. lathe on standby. I am going to replace the wooden former with a solid Nylon rod. Machine each end to create bobbin style primary winding carriers then sleeve them with 86mm O/D tubes. I have now got the gist of the Primary winding, 4 layers of 24 turns each end. It also states that the secondary windings are wound opposite to each other. Same goes for the primary. But my only query.... Which would be the best way of coupling Pri to sec? Pri CW sec CCW? Or both same direction? Perhaps I have answered my own question? As the two halves interact with each other then Pri/Sec should probably run together?

Addendum. As I am making a reasonably high tech build, ie modern materials, what about a high tech driver? Any ideas?

Well like I said the driver can be like the slayer exciter. I don't know if he used transistors or not but I think I remember him using transistors. For low level voltage this should be fine. I'm gonna try field effect transistors since they are the closest to tube type operations.

[Grumage]

Well like I said the driver can be like the slayer exciter. I don't know if he used transistors or not but I think I remember him using transistors. For low level voltage this should be fine. I'm gonna try field effect transistors since they are the closest to tube type operations.

Yes the Slayer was Transistor driven, I built and tested a derivative that used 2 X 2N2222 transistors back to back. This was a very low current device and very high frequency I wonder if as you suggested run at 20khz but with a bit of oomf behind it? Sorry for the highly technical term  I have also got some 100V 100A mosfet's coming with the wire order. I was thinking on the lines of an H bridge setup?

[Zeitmaschine]

hey guys, iam new in this forum and i have one question for now. i have 20 ferite toroids :Al=3450nH f49xf31.8xf19mm it wil be ok?

If this gives free energy then it will be OK.

This is principles Tesla Switch (charge two paralely joined capacitors/batteries with serialy joined capacitors/batteries and switch to back more hundred times in one second) some guys replicated this stuff

And? Does it work?

[zcsaba77]

If this gives free energy then it will be OK.
And? Does it work?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGZnlEIs2Y8&list=LLmU7eAeUf30Cu3fSZgL7v1g