Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[magpwr]

To Grumage,Acca and HG8AD,

Thanks for providing valuable input for me to compute.

To Grumage,

The word "Avramenko plug" was new to me so i did a search and bump into this site listed below where the device creator in this site proof that
"single-wire electrical energy transmission based upon the principle of longitudinal electrostatic waves as described by Nikola Tesla in the 1890s"
is indeed a fact and workable.

v1.2 with workable results and important circuit diagram.
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/afep012.htm

Objective of the experiment as revealed in v1.0 in above site.
-To proof Avramenko's single-wire transmission system concept.
-coupling with earth atmosphere for the purpose of tapping free electrons in the air.

Another Interesting site to look at as well
http://members.tele2.nl/kovavla/experiments.html

Back to topic-
I would not consider using high voltage "Variable vacuum capacitor" although this is a good\professional solution for tuning since it's stable.
But it's very pricey for one component.
May consider variable Air cap which i already have in hand.

Base on my observation base on the full uncut video  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7jbUA6_10c     

I realized that they are trying to tune the receiver coil which is the Caduceus coil assembly by using ferrite rod(Little more challenging way to tune) instead of variable cap.
Am i right to say they trying to match the resonance frquency of the receiver\Caduceus coil assembly to the T2 HV-coil which is oscillating at 16.8khz or 16.9khz.

The part which will make us all interested is 3.4w or 34watt input power to power 100watt light bulb.
Can i  safely say-This experiment may have some elements of "Avramenko plug" concept esp:tapping free electrons in the air using HV.Since there is excess energy being tapped to power bulb.
If only they rectify the voltage from bulb or use some sort of step down of air transformer or using large maybe 3" ferrite toroid  back to battery  to self sustain it would be very very nice OU experiment.

Truly eye opener indeed.

To Acca,

Thanks for getting the link for us.This coil assembly video is definitely an eye opener for me.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GlaYj7J5s8

I'm thinking if we can get better results using quite thin copper sheets or Braided copper wire(flat version) to create a Caduceus coil formation as describe in video.
Taking note the width of copper sheet remain similar to original video which uses copper wire 2mm x 5(strands)=10mm/1cm total width for the Caduceus winding.
This use of copper sheet might be a better solution to further reduce magnetic flux leakage within Caduceus coil(Base on video there are tiny gaps between 5 wires) hence this might increase efficiency.
Although using Alumimum tape is more easy solution but it's internal resistance is higher than copper hence not suitable at all.

[zcsaba77]

The part which will make us all interested is 3.4w or 34watt input power to power 100watt light bulb.

Hi

Are you know whats wrong with these experiment!? Like HG8AD said if bulb consume 34Watts will light but not so brightly.
My opinion if someone build device and want to show us how OU run, must use two same light bulbs (example 2pcs 100w 220v)
and one bulb connect to device for load and second one for normal power grid, and put side by side show the difference or similarity.

regards zcsaba77

[captainkt]

Hi Zeitmaschine, I think Barbosa is very interesting and possibly how TK and other are actually doing things, using HV and Tesla to hide the secret.Please try to find out a little more detail as I have tried so many coil set ups, perhaps mods to transformer is the way to go as the transformer in bedroom 2004 demo looks tampered with.
Regards
Keith

[magpwr]

Hi

Are you know whats wrong with these experiment!? Like HG8AD said if bulb consume 34Watts will light but not so brightly.
My opinion if someone build device and want to show us how OU run, must use two same light bulbs (example 2pcs 100w 220v)
and one bulb connect to device for load and second one for normal power grid, and put side by side show the difference or similarity.

regards zcsaba77

Hi ,

I did not ask how HG8AD  got that info about that input current is 34watt.I forgot to ask him about that earlier.
Base on video they measured it's 3.4watt.

May i suggest  to read this interesting site about
Single-Wire Electric Power Transmission -Using "Avramenko's plug" .This site also contain formulas on how to calculate the power from "Avramenko's plug" for those whom are more adventures.

http://www.doctorkoontz.com/Scalar_Physics/Avramenko%27s%20Plug/single%20wire%20power%20transmission.htm

[zcsaba77]

I did not ask how HG8AD  got that info about that input current is 34watt.I forgot to ask him about that earlier.
Base on video they measured it's 3.4watt.

I dont saw also in beginning, but they showed in video at around 14:40, big ammeter 30-31 Amp, but on top is switched to 0.5A, they measured 150mA and if input was 220volts, then is 33watts, but without showing next same bulb powering from grid, proof the similarity, it no meaning, speak about how much was input side consumption, it is just mine opinion