Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[SeaMonkey]

Very good link FarmHand.

I like his enthusiasm and style.

His advice to "keep it simple" is well stated.

What we really need in the way of understanding
to make things "work" is indeed simple.  Getting
bogged down with theoretical unknowns can
introduce needless confusion into any discussion.

Capacitors are fascinating and, of course, will
ultimately cause one to wonder:  Do capacitors
develop any CEMF or BEMF in normal operation
or is that a strictly inductive property?

[NickZ]

  Capacitors make me wonder, all right...  I wonder why adding a whole bunch of smaller ones in parallel affects a circuit in possibly unknown beneficial ways.

     Just in case that some of you here have not seen any my newer videos on the ¨"Resonant Magnetic Generator"  (GeoFusion "round core", modified by Nick)
     Here is the link to my latest video, as well as my new channel on YouTube.
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbSJx91vtO4
   http://www.youtube.com/channel/UChwfL5U16oZ20H6zuW-LIHg

[jbignes5]

Very good link FarmHand.

I like his enthusiasm and style.

His advice to "keep it simple" is well stated.

What we really need in the way of understanding
to make things "work" is indeed simple.  Getting
bogged down with theoretical unknowns can
introduce needless confusion into any discussion.

Capacitors are fascinating and, of course, will
ultimately cause one to wonder:  Do capacitors
develop any CEMF or BEMF in normal operation
or is that a strictly inductive property?

I have to agree that capacitors are very interesting but your last question is something I might help you with Bemf I think is due to Self induction of segmented conductors in correct relation to itself and the electric field that is around the segmented components. Whereas the capacitor generally does not include a contiguous segmented conductor. Yes capacitors are wrapped but in such a way that is not continuous ie. a current path, so no bemf would not be a component of a capacitor and hence why they can near instantly discharge then recharge.


Self induction is like a resistance to a coil. It builds till no current flows at all until there is a change in the field of the coil.


I think this is the reason Tesla started looking into the bifilar coils. It was a way to bring the non self induction of a capacitor into the realm of a coil so that it could continuously charge then discharge without the resistance that is notable in normal solenoid winds. Without a resistance like that a coil could charge and form the magnetic field nearly instantly instead of waiting for the self induction of the coil to fill the coil with energy. This would make it appear that the bifilar coil is stronger at producing magnetic fields only that it takes way less time to charge that coil due to low self inductance. The capacitive element of the bifilar coil.


Stivep Also has turned me onto the video series he has linked in a post. Thank you Stivep.


It is funny how it parallels my own ideas about how we went wrong and the corrections that we need to use to make them correct. This guy is an EE that has done his homework to prove the big fallacies that have pervaded our science for over 300 years. I recommend watching the whole series to get a handle on the bigger picture we have refused to see.

Although he does not believe in Overunity I get the feeling he knows where the energy comes from and that negates any OverUnity claims. OU was only used as a term because we did not know where the extra energy came from in some setups. Now he is tearing down walls and building a solid foundation to build our new science. He also rectifies quite a few things that didn't jive between the different aspects of science. Quite informative and very interesting to watch... Thanks again Stivep...

For your viewing pleasure that video series:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sUe6SL22NA

[Zeitmaschine]

Very good link FarmHand.

I like his enthusiasm and style.

His advice to "keep it simple" is well stated.

What we really need in the way of understanding
to make things "work" is indeed simple.  Getting
bogged down with theoretical unknowns can
introduce needless confusion into any discussion.

I would rather like a simple explanation how electrons can be drawn out of a metallic object without the need of having a closed electric circuit. Because that's the trick of Kapanadze, Stepanov and Barbosa to make things work.

Actually I would like to see Kapanadze, Stepanov and Barbosa explaining their devices in such an enthusiastic style.

[SeaMonkey]

I would rather like a simple explanation how electrons can be drawn out of a metallic object without the need of having a closed electric circuit. Because that's the trick of Kapanadze, Stepanov and Barbosa to make things work.

At Radio Frequencies the explanation is quite simple
and entails radiation, possibly ionization and of course
the mysterious "displacement current."

Whether any of the above mentioned are able to do
so as a demonstration of Over Unity or Free Energy
in any way other than that by which Daniel Pomerleau
does it remains to be established.