Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[forest]

I can't see the relevance of that question.

But Stepanov has it also. Why should inventors keep faking things which obviously cannot be? The idea of stealing hundreds of KW from grid with a ground wire is also ridiculous. If there is only single wire earth return then anyway the grid supply should not be very effective and powerful in order to branch away that amount of energy under the radar.

Hence my today's theory: What could happen when an electromagnetic field is mixed with an electrostatic field? The precise method does not matter. Maybe with transistors or thyristors, maybe without. Maybe with a flyback for HV generation, maybe with some other means to get a static (high) voltage field.

You will fint it when you realized what is electrostatic, because it is not static 

[Grumage]

Hence my today's theory: What could happen when an electromagnetic field is mixed with an electrostatic field? The precise method does not matter. Maybe with transistors or thyristors, maybe without. Maybe with a flyback for HV generation, maybe with some other means to get a static (high) voltage field.

Dear Zeitmaschine.

Hold and cherish that thought !! 

Cheers Grum.

[Zeitmaschine]

The bearded guy holds the secret. 

(Un)fortunately the bearded guy is missing during Stepanov's presentations.

or its so ridiculously simple that we just want to complicate everything

If the basic principle would be complex then there would be no need to constantly hide the key part of the device.

when you realized what is electrostatic, because it is not static 

Then the term »electrostatic« is misleading? Should we call it rather electrodynamic?

Hold and cherish that thought !! 

My workbench is flooded with thoughts. Just can't bring them together.

[Hoppy]

(Un)fortunately the bearded guy is missing during Stepanov's presentations.

Wrong film. 

[energia9]

Grumage, how do you know?
Zeitmaschine , secret component?  i once have posted about a pressurized spark gap, the guy has a patent and have also documented his work with plausible data,  he claims 900% ou ,  what he did was pressurized a glass container with 6.6 bar of pressure,  he used xenon gas, but said it is not limited to it but that worked the best,  i found other patents around this field which used nitrogen and also ozone.   he said as he raised the pressure to a certain point the output was greater out than in. 

this was my earlier post on here
up to 900% efficiency claimed:
http://www.rexresearch.com/imris/imris.htm
he is not the only one with similar principle
20x overunity claimed:
http://www.rexresearch.com/koldomsv/koldomsv.htm

5x overunity claimed:
http://www.rexresearch.com/nelson/nelson.htm

400% excess energy claimed
http://www.rexresearch.com/articles/activen.htm

if this works this is certainly is so simple that it makes me laugh.

Then the secret component is a highly pressurized spark gap. (gas or liquid)
and ionised gas, plasma is responsible for this effect.



but i could be very wrong,