Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[TinselKoala]

The legend intentionally reads »sparking from ground« not »sparking to ground«.

Uh-huh. Isn't the output of the system AC? So how can one tell, exactly, the "direction" of the sparking at the ground non-connection? If this point is considered to be important... is there any evidence for the "direction" of sparking?


You do realize that the thing as diagrammed in the schematic is essentially a spark-gap transmitter and will be radiating lots of RF noise from the antenna, right?

[TinselKoala]

Then please complete the circuit to show the conversion to something useful.

Put a ham operator's code key where the "sparking" connection is and you have a useful broadband Morse Code transmitter.

[Zeitmaschine]

Uh-huh. Isn't the output of the system AC? So how can one tell, exactly, the "direction" of the sparking at the ground non-connection? If this point is considered to be important... is there any evidence for the "direction" of sparking?

Since the spark evidently does not consume any energy from the battery (DC can be measured easily) it has to consume energy from the environment (the aether or something like that). Can't see any other explanation. The device just provides the proper condition (energy sink) for the vacuum energy to flow in.

This correlates with the pulsing of »the line«. But still the »bird on the line« (LC circuit) is missing here.

You do realize that the thing as diagrammed in the schematic is essentially a spark-gap transmitter and will be radiating lots of RF noise from the antenna, right?

Means it creates not only light and heat for free (without putting additional load on the battery) but also RF noise for free.

[TinselKoala]

Of course there is another explanation. The thing is running at full power, wastefully. When the spark happens, you don't see any change in the input power because it is already drawing as much as it can draw, and the spark comes from a momentary decrease in inefficiency.

[Zeitmaschine]

The thing is running at full power, wastefully.

How can a not connected secondary (no spark) waste energy so it needs full power? Without the dimmer (directly connected) it draws around 0.9 amps from the battery. With dimmer (set to 50% duty cycle) it draws only around 0.5 amps from the battery. Nevertheless the spark is much larger.

When the spark happens, you don't see any change in the input power because it is already drawing as much as it can draw

It can easily draw more input power when the secondary of the HV transformer is shorted (via a resistor).

and the spark comes from a momentary decrease in inefficiency.

A decrease in inefficiency means the same as an increase in efficiency. When the input is e.g. 12 volts at 0.5 amps then the input power is 6 watts. Hence the output power (thermal energy) of the whole device should be also 6 watts. That would mean when the spark occurs the device must cool down in order to provide the additional energy for the spark without putting additional load on the battery? Strange things are going on here.