a metal pyramid, is a zero point energy causing/collecting device.

[triffid]

I am really only wanting to get power from the aether or the spin of electrons going around an atom.Not radio waves or cosmic rays(lakhovsky coils do that already).I know of a few cases where this happens in nature(mostly in magnets).I did hear of insect antigravity.You can google it up"insect antigravity".If true the only energy here is coming from the spin of electrons.The man was supposed to make a flying platform from the bodies(or wings) of dead insects.Triffid

[triffid]

If the story of insect antigravity is true I can only say that I'm not surprised that life found a way to defy gravity.Given that billions of species have appeared on this earth and any advantage found by life finds its way into the next generation.Not too long ago I heard of a fungus that feeds off of radioactive radiation.There a pigment involved.Ionizing radiation pops out an electron and the fungus can use this as food.So we may in the future have giant fungus farms orbiting Jupiter feeding off the radiation found there?Who knows?Triffid

[the_big_m_in_ok]

@triffid
With respect to Replies #15 & #16,

I'm researching patents, that I might start a reference thread in the Extracting electricity from the atmosphere forum.

One patent I found had an antenna shaped, by wires with each wire having a capacitor connecting to the next, like a Lakhovsky antenna, but not all connected 90 degs. apart.

One might be able to collect energy from the aether with such a device, but that would probably require experimentation.

--Lee

[lltfdaniel1]

@triffid
With respect to Replies #15 & #16,

I'm researching patents, that I might start a reference thread in the Extracting electricity from the atmosphere forum.

One patent I found had an antenna shaped, by wires with each wire having a capacitor connecting to the next, like a Lakhovsky antenna, but not all connected 90 degs. apart.

One might be able to collect energy from the aether with such a device, but that would probably require experimentation.

--Lee

You have got to remember people who put patents up about this do hold back some important stuff...just for the sake of it getting a patent.

[the_big_m_in_ok]

lltfdaniel1 said:

You have got to remember people who put patents up about this do hold back some important stuff...just for the sake of it getting a patent.

Yeah, I see your point.  It's just that unless you prove to the examiners that your patent is sufficiently different and it's delineated in the claims to be wide-reaching, variable and full-spectrum in nature, you'll be denied on your application.  There are conflicting motives, here.  You don't necessarily need to be specific unless your claims are vague enough.  Some patents are incomprehensible to me for that reason.  Not enough information for me to see how it works.

--Lee