Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning 3 KWatts ERR unit powering 3 x 800 Watt lamps

Started by hartiberlin, July 26, 2009, 11:08:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

And of course Harvey, as our inside rabbit, is the only one who is even remotely in a position to find out more real information. YT videos aren't going to be very helpful in this case, especially if they are filled with obfuscating jargon, shills, and flashing blinky lights. It's clear from the videos that advertising is their purpose, not education; we are being told much more about the tacit operations of a schemer than we are about a revolutionary new energy device.

Instead of seeing it like a revelation from on high, try looking at it as a mystery novel, a whodunit of sorts. Remember the elemental rods. Consider the language used in the video. Did Doctor Schwartz sit down himself and figure out all the fancy "seek out and find" electronics, and then solder it all up himself? If you can light up a lightbulb with the original elemental rods, just the two rods on a little base... well, I think I'd prefer that one. After all, what's going to power your LEDs and seek-and-find circuit, BEFORE it's sought and found? Maybe it has an original elemental rod set inside, just for start-up.

So Harvey, if it is at all possible, it's up to you to infiltrate this shady operation and find out the real story. I don't care about the Pelican case, I want to see more of that original, simple, 2-rod Elemental Rod generator that was developed into the 6-rod version and then apparently into the present ERR device (which name cracks me up, I must say.) They clearly have moved beyond that device, so it should be no problem to examine it.

plumee

I think this thing is very exciting. I was looking around the web trying to do research on the left hand rule stuff. I have read that in the nanotechnology world there is lots of research going on and the "idea" behind this is valid. It seems like the Defense Department has an interest in this too. It doesn't seem important to me to disprove this thing or worry about what small country can't produce this or what organization can or can't sell it. That is time consuming waste and not solving the very real problems we have with energy and our planet. I think there is VERY intelligent people on this site and the Dr. even says in his papers that this is against conventional physics. I'm thinking this is a great opportunity to collectively design, develop, and get building. The computer was invented in a garage. Let's use this for our good. Why can't we use this area as a funnel to put together all the individual research we do topic related with links to help each other? We are looking here to solve a huge problem and this may very well be it.

TinselKoala

You are right, and the way to solve it would be for Schwartz to take his Pelican case down to the nearest major University and demonstrate that thing in front of a classroom full of EE and ME graduate students at their weekly symposium.

Or even to a corporate entity.

Every second that this does not happen is, to me, additional evidence that we are being, shall we say, misled.

rensseak

Quote from: TinselKoala on August 01, 2009, 07:34:26 AM
You are right, and the way to solve it would be for Schwartz to take his Pelican case down to the nearest major University and demonstrate that thing in front of a classroom full of EE and ME graduate students at their weekly symposium.

You really mean that it would so easy to go to the next University and demonstrat his intvention? What if they will not allow him this to do? Also they will ask him where the Energy is comeing from! And then?

Quote
Or even to a corporate entity.

to mislead him immediately?

TinselKoala

Quote from: rensseak on August 01, 2009, 08:45:26 AM
You really mean that it would so easy to go to the next University and demonstrat his intvention? What if they will not allow him this to do? Also they will ask him where the Energy is comeing from! And then?

to mislead him immediately?

It's pretty clear from that, that you don't know any graduate students. Believe me, you show up in the grad commons with that suitcase, you sit down and buy a beer for the first EE grad student student that walks by, and you will be on a process that will end with you being rich beyond your wildest dreams, the world changed beyond recognition.

IF, that is, you can prove that it works as represented.

The ONLY real reason that Schwartz does not do this, is because he can't.

Think about it. If the suppression conspiracies were real AND Schwartz has what he claims, why is he still walking around sucking air? Why do we know about it at all?  But he is, and we do. Conclude, then, that BOTH cannot be true.
Now, IF Schwartz truly has what he claims, then, by the above, suppression conspiracies cannot be true. SO, A)why isn't he going to Universities or corporations? And B)why is he following the exact same strategy that many other known scammers follow, instead of legitimately seeking patents and industrial support and development? But A he isn't, and B he is.
Therefore, I maintain that the conclusion is unavoidable, without even seeing the device in person, because of the behaviour of the "inventor."

Doctor of what, by the way? Awarded from which institution of higher learning? Where can I read his doctoral dissertation?
Inquiring minds want to know.