Stan Meyers tech experimenters please help

[dankie]

Yeah I tried the ss vic , I made it , it didnt work , I am dissapointed very much .

Ok so Stan made it work , but I cant follow his instructions and make it work , so I'm trying the brother now . Maybe his technique is better , it is certainly better explained , I really dont care if its an app or patent stage . This is pretty major stuff here so it might havea few hurdles .

[CrazyEwok]

Dankie... re-read my post... in fact re-read every post i have ever made and you will see one thing... I am interested in facts and specifics... I asked a specific question "if anyone had tested high voltage and minimal to no current" and if they had what was their results... not what you and your perspective team is currently doing i am not concerned with and if i wanted to know i would of asked... so direct question have you done the test/s with scaling voltage up to a point where it produces an effect? (there will always be an effect eventually regardless... if you push it far enough) from your answer (or lack there of) i would say you spent all of your efforts on your coils and when they didn't work you claimed scam... as i kept saying to you where is your ground work, when ever you were claiming you followed Stan to the letter??? you only relied with words of blind following claiming some breakthrough... <sigh> yet another fanatic following something blindly with out doing any ground work... no wonder this technology is a laughing stock... 3 things for you to remember...
If something is going to happen on a large scale you won't hit the most efficient point straight off the bat, and the concept will work on any scale with the right variables/conditions. (variables and/or conditions are the things that you need to play with).
Test small take result if favourable expand/enlarge. If not favourable redesign/re-look at design/concept (we are all human there may of been a mistake made or something over looked)
Take every idea from external sources with a piece of salt. Attempt to implement it into the design and look at possible co-effects.

So back to the question in the Original statement...

[dankie]

CrazyEwok , I will answer your question .

There is always electron leakage , the only way to stop that is with a very high resistance coating material . That will give you HV across the gap space but does not produce gas . Me and many others went down this route , its not it . Me and my colleagues have went down all the roads .We are quite "tired" now , and there is only one road left to go before we call it quits and accept our "slave status" .

Its the offseting phase and current that produces gas , you dont need amazing high voltages to see the Meyer effects , as confirmed by Stephen Meyers in the phone interview .

As you may already know , I always planify myself a financing strategy , i had big hopes for the ss VIC but that didnt work ,it was quite an expensive and troublesome coil , I only built one . I simply lak the knowledge in complex electromagnetic coils and resonance , I am more a "eletronics guy" . I have built many circuits during the summertime , I made my own version of the hex controller , a perfect pulser pwm , and a 200watt 3 phase AC pure sine driver/oscillator . I am a small electronics hobbyist like I said but I am faster than most electronic engineers that I know , I see the solution of w/e given task rather quickly .

I fused all my work on a pcb and selling it for 350$ . It is unique research equipment that is equivalent to 1000$ radio equipment . It is the last and final things to try before calling it quits and moving on with our lives . Re-looking @ the impedance matching network as shown in the hydroxyl refilling patent .

Do not waste your $ on any other experiment , me and my colleagues tried , It was the best amateur research group in history,  there was much knowledge , much discipline in our group  , many thousands of dollars spent and countless hundreds of hours testing and re-coiling and so on ... There was never a real emphasis on wavelenght matching of the trodes and impedance matching tho , it was mostly trial and error .

[HeairBear]

I myself fall in the category of failed attempts and such. I would have to say I did learn from my mistakes and I have not given up quite yet like so many who come through this forum. Before the independent study pdf came around, I had already been researching with the Lawton circuit and cell with poor results. That document has the actual diagrams and pictures showing the equipment inside and out. It's a no brainer to follow and the circuits are very easy to build. Yet no person has built it. Like myself, most get hooked by the Lawton stuff and all the other myths running around making it an endless puzzle. Well, now I hope to use my better judgment this time and go for the real deal instead of following everyone else. Here are pictures for comparison... What do you think is the right diagram to follow?

[dankie]

The grounded cell in chapter 8 is the same design Stephen uses .

triple tubes with the middle reference tube.

But Stephen perfected it , he made it solid state and more efficient . It is possible to use a transformer with his method .