Stan Meyers tech experimenters please help

[CrazyEwok]

Stan Meyers concept of separating water using only the voltage and minimal current (only current used is the inevitable leakage). Has anyone actually tested this? i know many have had their attempted replications and tend not to work as expected. My question is has anyone literally tested his theory of increasing voltage with minimal current? if so what voltage levels did you use. what effects did you observe. What current leakage did you have.
As a standard i would also like to know if you used tap water or distilled. Also if you added any e/lyte.

[dankie]

The Stan Meyers thing dont work , its not a workeable design .

Most people now are experimenting with my master oscillator for the hydroxyl refilling patent . Wich is about 5 times more efficient than an alternator to get thois waves going .

Ofc it costs $ , its my intellectual property .

Or you can just monkey around with 2 alternators .

[HeairBear]

The Stan Meyers thing dont work , its not a workeable design .

Most people now are experimenting with my master oscillator for the hydroxyl refilling patent . Wich is about 5 times more efficient than an alternator to get thois waves going .

Ofc it costs $ , its my intellectual property .

Or you can just monkey around with 2 alternators .

LOL, you have got to be kidding me! On what basis do you make this claim?

[dankie]

As for the efficiency claim , I base my claim on the basis that if you run an alternator at 3000 rpm , you are using a motor , 1 h/p = 747 watts . You have to pay not-only for the motor driving the alternator but also but also the current going in the cell .

Synthetizing with a few millamps and the losses occured in the transistors as heat with the amplification stage is the only loss . You pay less for your excitating wave . In the end , it costed you less electricity to make that gas , tuned resonant OU cell or not .

Also not to mention the limited frequency wich such a mechanical drive device , frequency is resonance , resonance is efficiency .

As for the claim that Stan's design are maybe not so complete and perfect , Stephen confirms that himself in an interview .

[HeairBear]

The Stan Meyers thing dont work , its not a workeable design .

Let' start with this sentence. This is the big one. I don't ever recall Stephen producing any demonstrable device, let alone a water powered car. Stan's devices worked just fine, your inability to replicate his work does not mean his designs do not work. The rest of your post is invalidated by the first sentence, so, I need not make further argument. Your second post has some merit, but, it misses the point of the subject altogether.Your cutting your own throat dankie. That filling station bit is just an application, he was never granted a patent. The incompleteness Stephen spoke of in the interview was pertaining to the drawings. They are made that way on purpose for obscurity. I find it rather odd that you have come to your conclusions from a telephone interview and a patent application. Not so long ago you were claiming that Stan used stainless steel wire exclusively and you were trying to sell it at the same time. What happen to that? No one bought it did they? The same will be for your intellectual property, or is it really Stephen's?