Yu oscillating Generator ---- Overunity YOG Model

[WattBuilder]

@ Bulbz and Spider4re

Thanks for your support guys.   

@All

If your wondering about the array picture that I posted for Stefan.
Yes, It can be used for other applications as we’ll. 

It can also improve the Worlds Transportation System

I had to get that off my mind.

Howard
YOG Gain Video  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cq5r08eqgsk

[synchro1]

A pulse recover circuit consisting of a capacitor to recover and return the pulse to the power coil to move a solenoid plunger and throw lever, would cut the operating battery power input in half. A DPDT reed switch and two trigger magnets, one on each end of a T bar halfway down the pendulum arm,
would reverse the polarity of the solenoid pulse coil where ever desired, but past the array on each side. The pendulum magnet can rotate on it' CG, collect the pulse and return it with the simple addition of two 45 degree gears. One coil one battery one magnet. A Joule theif charger could keep the run battery topped off, the rest period between pulses is so long, and the run cost could drop below zero, or go O.U. on it's own.

[spoondini]

Hhoward,
  Patented devices are allowed in eric's open prize for ou.  http://www.phact.org/e/freetest.html.  His endorsement would be huge for you.

Recommend you give it a shot.
Somewhere on his website there's also an open offer from an individual for 1 million for ou verification. 

Convincing folks here is not going to carry any weight.

[powercat]

Howard
Have you decided on which method you are going to use to make the device run-itself,
and if you have, how long do you think it will take before you can demonstrate OU ?
cat

[markdansie]

@wattbuilder,
the request of removing the magnetic array can be achieved by shielding it or increasing the distance between the magnet (IE shorten the shaft.) Removal of it all together would be better.

It appears you are unwilling to do this. Why?

A common mistake with inventors and even some university researchers is that they sometimes only see the data they want to see not all of it. Often when I am engaged to verify devices I am amazed that even engineers can be fooled......and when they are, they answer " I just wanted to believe it worked that much that procedure went out the door".

Up until now I have given you the benefit of the doubt, I still do, but only just. My associates who (and you guessed some are ex NASA, and many scientists) already dismissed your claims and questioned why I even wasted my time with it. The truth is I am open minded. But when you refuse to do simple tests like remove the magnetic array or not centre the mangets so there is no weight shifting, then it is obvious you are either self deluded or trying to pull a scam of.
I have nothing to prove here, in fact most people think I am an arsehole, however my track record is 100% correct. I just gave a deposition for a court case in Seattle and my involvement in another case this year resulted in an arrest warrent in South Africa. I do not piss about with people who make false claims and take other peoples money.So far you haven't tried to take other peoples monies.
All I have asked, as many others have, is for two simple tests or changes to be made. Failure or lack of a good reason to do so will be very revealing.Your device is simple to replicate so it is only a matter of time before someone else conducts the same test.
I guess this in some ways is what I call peer review. Ultimately I and many others want to help you progress your project. There is no room for ignorance or bad methodology.
I wish you well , and please ask you reconsider running the test without the magnetic array or changing the device to turning the magnet without weight shifting.
With good intentions and kind regards
Mark Dansie