Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Yu oscillating Generator ---- Overunity YOG Model

Started by WattBuilder, September 14, 2009, 03:19:15 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

spoondini

Howard,
    Nice to see some updates.  Sounds like you're making progress.  Have you had any success with 2 cycles yet using the windvane mechanism previously mentioned?  I'm following your developments with interest.  Continued acceleration through multiple cycles will be the proof your concept will work.  The novelty of mixing a magnetic motor (kind of) with a pendulum is something I've never seen before.  It just might work.

So you're saying that you have confirmed continuous acceleration in 'slow motion'!!!!!  That's awesome.

spoondini

Was just thinking (dangerous)...
Before we pop the cork on the champagne bottle and celebrate the first perpetual motion device in the history of mankind, I realized that you are adding energy every time you stop the device and manually turn around the magnets.  Kind of like a SMOT, you have to position the ball each time (adding energy). Although this might seem negligible, you're not gaining that much energy with each oscillation, and the act of turning over the magnet, whether using electric, air resistance, or gravity will create a drag on the unit potentially wiping out the gains.  In short, the experiment you conducted is not conclusive and what you deemed as trivial is now the determining factor as to whether the YOG will achieve OU.

The final proof will be in a self running unit that does not rely on external power or tampering of any kind.  Not yet ready to start throwing any $$'s at the device until we hit the undisputable point of OU.

broli

Quote from: spoondini on October 19, 2009, 09:20:13 AM
Was just thinking (dangerous)...
Before we pop the cork on the champagne bottle and celebrate the first perpetual motion device in the history of mankind, I realized that you are adding energy every time you stop the device and manually turn around the magnets.  Kind of like a SMOT, you have to position the ball each time (adding energy). Although this might seem negligible, you're not gaining that much energy with each oscillation, and the act of turning over the magnet, whether using electric, air resistance, or gravity will create a drag on the unit potentially wiping out the gains.  In short, the experiment you conducted is not conclusive and what you deemed as trivial is now the determining factor as to whether the YOG will achieve OU.

The final proof will be in a self running unit that does not rely on external power or tampering of any kind.  Not yet ready to start throwing any $$'s at the device until we hit the undisputable point of OU.

First in history, lol have you been sleeping outside?

Anyway that's the whole point isn't it, to spin the magnet on the rod. The magnet is so far out of the field that you can call any effect on it negligible. So the only thing that remains is to use some of the energy you gained to spin the setup. But even in theory the magnet on the rod is pretty symmetrical so it should technically take no energy at all to spin it. I encourage that the first setup should be completely mechanic to blow any talk of energy input out of the water.

spoondini

Broli - I'm also very optimistic about this setup, but by nature I'm a critical thinker and extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

BTW - You implied that there are other perpetual motion devices, could you please point me to one that has been undisputably demonstrated (not one where the inventor disappears and we are trying, but unsuccessfully, to replicate).  I know of pendulums which have swung for years, but they will eventually stop.  The Finsrud will run for a couple of months before being reset.  I would love to see a genuine perpetual motion device.

broli

Quote from: WattBuilder on October 19, 2009, 08:44:50 AM
Hi All,
This new array set up seems to out perform my previous array by about 6 inches. Its based on repulsive force is greater then attraction force.
I’m going to be switching over to this for future testing until better comes along.

Howard
My one cycle video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gekDM8vg16k

Have you considered using a halbach array and compare that to your current results. It should make the field about two times stronger.

http://www.skytran.net/phpsite/media/inductrack%20halbach%20array.jpg