Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Yu oscillating Generator ---- Overunity YOG Model

Started by WattBuilder, September 14, 2009, 03:19:15 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

WattBuilder

Spoondini,
I’m not sure what you mean about the plate? The original OU YOG uses a servo to orientate the drive magnet direction. The Tail Vane method allows for aerodynamics and acts like a guide to keep the drive magnet from turning while in the array. Depending on the array of course.

I’m not talking orders on the Overunity model. I’m talking orders for the Wind and Wave YOG models. There is no mention about Overunity at my website for some of the same reasons you have mentioned.
It’s hard enough getting into the renewable energy industry as it is without mentioning OU.

But it’s good that you see the merits of the Overunity YOG model. I still have yet to try some other concepts for an actuator. Some that I wonder are the Tri-gate, V ramp, and SMOT devices? I haven’t had much luck with Perendev methods yet.

Howard

spoondini

I was also thinking about smot like devices in this design.  I'm not sure if it will ultimately work because what were essentially taliking about is a magnetic gate, and these don't really exist.  It requires as much energy (actually more) to position at the trigger point than imparted by the gate.

I still think your on to something.

WattBuilder

Spoondini,
We’ll it’s just something I may be looking into in the future.
As for magnetic gates not existing. What is your definition of it ? How are you basing on.

@all
I’m also posting at the EF renewable energy forum too.

Howard

spoondini

Magnetic gates meaning unidirectional magnetic acceleration with free entry, these don't exist (yet?).  If it did, you could simply build a rotor with a permanent maget one of those nifty trigates to continously accelerate.  I think it would be a waste of time (my oppinion).

With respect to your device, I was thinking smot like because the reason smots haven't been closed is because of the inability to return the ball to it's starting point.  By using a pendulum to 'catch' the ball, mechanical/gravity device to spin it around and align for a return pass across a different smot (parallell but opposite), could we possibly close the loop and get energy out of magnets?

Please take this as a voice of reality as opposed to pessism, but I 'think' there will be a repelling magnetic force near the entry to the smot/gate which will negate the energy gained through the acceleration.

Can you sketch out ur current mag setup on top the pendulum?

WattBuilder

Quote from: spoondini on October 09, 2009, 05:52:54 PM
Magnetic gates meaning unidirectional magnetic acceleration with free entry, these don't exist (yet?).  If it did, you could simply build a rotor with a permanent maget one of those nifty trigates to continously accelerate.  I think it would be a waste of time (my oppinion).

Spoondini,
Well I like to give it a try ….    ;D

Quote from: spoondini on October 09, 2009, 05:52:54 PM
With respect to your device, I was thinking smot like because the reason smots haven't been closed is because of the inability to return the ball to it's starting point.  By using a pendulum to 'catch' the ball, mechanical/gravity device to spin it around and align for a return pass across a different smot (parallell but opposite), could we possibly close the loop and get energy out of magnets?

Please take this as a voice of reality as opposed to pessism, but I 'think' there will be a repelling magnetic force near the entry to the smot/gate which will negate the energy gained through the acceleration.

I see it too but my original thinking was to have the arc closer to the fulcrum of the YOG. That way the ball enters and exit out of the array past the mouth. It’s almost like dropping the ball a quarter in the array and then having the ball drop out a quarter before the end of the array.   

I notice when magnets are close together the electrons seem to bleed over to the neighbor magnets and concrete at the ends of the array.

A Gyro looking like device may be used instead of a ball. It looks like one of those arcade game room rides where the child straps into the center and spins around all axis.

I hate to switch directions but it is tempting for me to test it ….   :'(

Quote from: spoondini on October 09, 2009, 05:52:54 PM
Can you sketch out ur current mag setup on top the pendulum?

Sure, for the readers of this tread, this picture is what I used in my proof of concept that energy can be harness from magnets.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gekDM8vg16k

Attached is a drawing of the array. I do get resistance entering into the array. It’s the “little wheel big wheel effect”. Further adjustments on this will increase the amount of energy captured from magnets.

Also notice how I use the iron as a flux extension. The HJ banana shape brings the counter flux spin too close for my preference.

Enjoy
Howard