Yu oscillating Generator ---- Overunity YOG Model

[spoondini]

Spoondini,
You claim you have experience working with magnets. So what’s your hold up on doing the experiment? Certainly even you can make a simple pendulum and video it. Or is the fact of the matter is that your too comfortable sitting on your high horse passing judgment.

Howard

Probably the same reason you haven't demonstrated continuous acceleration without batteries.

[WilbyInebriated]

Probably the same reason you haven't demonstrated continuous acceleration without batteries.

because it can't be done? is that what you are saying spooner? or are you just avoiding the question?

[WattBuilder]

@Tinu,

You’re the one misleading readers and have the gaps in understanding, not me……….. sorry.   

The movie proves the point I already stated twice so far. Now for the third and hopefully for the last time:
Initial gravitational potential energy (Eg) of the OC’s setup is altered by magnetic field with a certain quantity that is magnetic potential energy (Em). In one case, total initial potential energy is Eg + Em (attraction) and in the other case it is Eg-Em (repulsion).
Because Eg+Em>Eg-Em (obviously, huh?!), the device oscillates asymmetrically, as per the same movie. No energy gain, no energy loss. Just gaps, gaps and other gaps in understanding …

You have this backwards it should be:

Eg-Em>Eg+Em is True
Eg+Em>Eg-Em is False
Eg-Em=Eg+Em is False

You claim that you are a physicist of 25 years that has studied potential energy, then magnetism and conservative fields.

Surely, You did not make the classroom mistake of thinking repulsive force is equal to attraction force.

Those that actually have the knowledge and who are skilled in the art. Would tell you that when it comes to magnets the force of repulsive is greater than attraction forces.     

You have just destroyed your grounds for argument.
Your posts are of no relevance.     

If you don’t believe me then look it up. If you don’t believe the books then get two magnets and feel it.

Howard



@Exnihiloest,

It’s not a question of faith when reasoning is involved.

Changing the design to prove it doesn’t work is not grounds for argument. You just proving your way is wrong.


Howard

[powercat]

Hi Howard
Are you any closer to making it run by itself ?
cat

[tinu]

You claim that you are a physicist of 25 years that has studied potential energy, then magnetism and conservative fields.

Yes, that's me. And you are what exactly? You forgot to mention, right?! 
Nevermind. It's clear to whom I've tried to speak.
If my posts are of relevance or not it's up to others and it's clearly above your head; sorry but it was a waste of time trying to explain to you where you went off track then self-delusional.
I'd just say you better skip preaching non-sense and let the mankind know when you're done, "inventor".
Meanwhile, because it's going to be a very very long while, best of luck!