Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Yu oscillating Generator ---- Overunity YOG Model

Started by WattBuilder, September 14, 2009, 03:19:15 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

happyfunball

Quote from: nightlife on January 30, 2010, 12:14:24 AM


  The gravitational assistance is canceled out by the return back towards  start with work left to return back to start. I had considered using a electromagnetic coil to help the assist back to start but then energy required is greater then the energy created. A jule theif may help in this but at best all we would get is a perprtual motion that would stop with the slightest amount of resistance added. I have not went that far with testing because I felt it was a waste of time. Another option was to cancel the magnetic field using a electromagnetiic coil after the arm was in the field  to allow a smother exit canceling out the resistance of the gate. But again, the energy required trumps the enrgy created.

The arm's weight is a factor as is the distances traveled. Remember that when calculating. There is no sense in me explaining any more then I have already. Either you get it or you don't. If you don't, you will eventually.

This is the crux of the hypothesis. I do think the first few passes need to be cancelled out of the equation. Howard, how about settling it and attempting to rig a YOG powered motor for the arm magnet. Any extra energy would be OU in theory.

WattBuilder


Quote from: Nightlife on January 29, 2010, 09:29:58 PM
I doubt you accounted for the weight of the arm which must be factored in.

You don't want to get into a pissing match with me. I am only trying to help you save some time. I am not book smart but common sense is one of my fortes.   

Nightlife,
So you did not do the test.
It sounds like now your basing my work on your own failures.

Quote from: Nightlife on January 29, 2010, 09:52:43 PM
LOL, as I said before, I already tested this. Gravity has an equal north and south just as does a magnet. Don't forget that.   

We’ll it’s clear you didn’t. My array is not a SMOT. In my array the sticky spot is in the entrance of the array’s travel direction. SMOT’s are at the end of the travel direction. Apples and Oranges

Your mind keeps trying to justify it based on assumptions. You keep referring back to the weight of the lever. Look at the data. Can you see the lever weighing less than 0.1 pounds? Did your mind just blocked it out again? Don’t forget magnets have an unequal force with other magnets, It’s a fact.

Quote from: Nightlife on January 30, 2010, 12:14:24 AM
The gravitational assistance is canceled out by the return back towards  start with work left to return back to start.

Do I really have to explain how a pendulum works now ?

Listen Nightlife I’m willing to help you but when you open discussions with me, Attacking my work, I will defend it.

Your posts are of no relevance to me. Anybody reading it can just see your reasoning. 


Quote from: happyfunball on January 30, 2010, 12:47:24 AM
This is the crux of the hypothesis. I do think the first few passes need to be cancelled out of the equation. Howard, how about settling it and attempting to rig a YOG powered motor for the arm magnet. Any extra energy would be OU in theory.

@Happyfunball,
We’ll for now I want finish my measurements of the array.
I’m thinking of either placing a long spring attached to the probe of the force gauge to measure energy or attaching a string to the lever pulling a weight up off the ground. I haven’t made a final decision yet but I’m still looking for a better way.

Howard
Video: The Yu Effect â€" Kinetic energy gain from magnets
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBtl0OTSccs



futuristic

Hi Howard.

In this video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gekDM8vg16k ) you have already shown that you get energy gain.
Nobody can dispute that so there is really no need to try to show that again.

The only important thing now is: "Can you rotate swinging magnet with that energy gain?". If you can, than you have a selfrunner.

Keep up the good work!
Frenky

WattBuilder

Quote from: futuristic on January 31, 2010, 04:15:24 AM
Hi Howard.

In this video (http://www.a.com/watch?v=gekDM8vg16k ) you have already shown that you get energy gain.
Nobody can dispute that so there is really no need to try to show that again.

The only important thing now is: "Can you rotate swinging magnet with that energy gain?". If you can, than you have a selfrunner.

Keep up the good work!
Frenky

Thanks Frenky,
If that’s how my supporters feel then I will advance my work to show it.
I will now move forward to demonstrate the “Throw Method” in my next video.

Howard


Dumbas

Hi howard I havn,t got much to say but keep going - you have been so gracious to all who have conversed with you.Its a greater credit  to you than invention. Look forward to your next video.