Romanian SECRET Technology which WORKED ! Lots of OU.

[Lucian Stefan]

Hi, Mark

1. The obvious question is why are you now not the richest man in the world rather than accept a job in the Military?

- First of all, the one who try to make fortune with this invention, should succeed the suicide; there are powerful groups which invest billion dollars in oil bussines and they not joke when somebody disturbs their bussines; second- for comercial use, the bussinesman must have the rights of author, so- the intelectual property or the same (heritage or assignment of rights, for instance); then, he must obtain the homologation of the mechanical product ant the trade mark- easy to say, difficult to do when the market is fully controled by the oil bussines with all its ramifications (the industry of cars, of aviation, etc, etc); the third, the investor must have all the capital necessary to build (witth discretion) the entire factory- because if he says what he intends to do, he will be stopped before even his first action; nobody really finance that kind of initiative and a lot of influent groups should try to sabotage it.
A lot of state agencies declare that they are ready to finance "the green projects" and the people who want to find the replacement of "fossil fuels"- but there are just word, because they never finance the REAL new technology solutions...
More precisely, in Romania all the stuff (the families of the President and Prime Minister, the "bussines circles" that support the main political parties, etc) are directly involved in the biggest fossil fuel bussines- the import/export of natural gases at large scale (international bussines which involved multinational companies and the high level interests of many governments, not only in Europe) and another bussines which should be disturbed by the comercial promotion on the market of the unconventional technologies.
I am not the inventor (the author) and I have not the right of intelectual property for the patents or the technical documents that I just manage; I have no right to request the omologation or the trade mark or to do any other comercial purpose or action; I have not the huge amounts necessary for lounching in the national or international market of a new technology that could revolutionize the industry and... the life. I just can make some porposals for military or another special applications. I collect and keep the technical or scientific information and more or less, sometime I make demonstration devices for support my proposals. I cannot give on the internet the classified informations because I should become offender (outlow) and in that case I could be convicted, losing everything. I can do... what I do. Who knows- maybe this crisis or a war (...) will change dramatically the world situation and in the new conditions the classified technologies will come to light for good. There is no "conspiracy"- there are several groups of billionaires "spread" all other this planet which hold the money, the industry and all the global economy. They defend their privileges and their big bussines- I don't see any "conspiracy" in this.

2. What did you do with this device?

-As I've said, I'll try to use it as demonstration device for support my proposals for military applications. I don't hope to make any "revolution", I just want to keep alive this kind of scientific researches- and the state authorities to accept even some limited and not public applications. That's not much but it should be much than nothing; the technologies should be known by several people and the research programe should be kept...

3. Was it independently tested?

No. But there is no doubt about the efficiency value. Even without any recording equipment- is undoubtful that it develops much more energy than it consumes. When I'll make the demonstrations it will be tested by "independent" persons. But it is not necessary- the research program of "magnetic motor" has much than 36 years old in Romania, and I have nothing new and no personal invention or improvement, but just the old invention and I try to give it some concrete applications. The complete tests was been made years ago by a professional research team. For me, it is simple to use their documents and my small demonstration device.

[markdansie]

@ Lucian,
Thank you for your detailed reply to my questions:
As for question 1. I agree in the past there have been interests that would rather see these technologies suppressed. However, governments and even the oil business have changed their thinking as they realise the limited resources available and environmental issues are real. There are now organisations that have large pools of money that are willing and able to support these new technologies. (Email me is you want more details)
If you do have a device you can demonstrate and would be allow others to test it, this can be arranged. I understand it is not your intellectual property, however that can be negotiated if the proof of concept can be demonstrated. (Money talks). These test can be done confidentially protecting your identity and privacy. Many devices that appear on this forum have been tested in this manner without public knowledge and the outcomes good and bad remain confidential.
Once again thank you for your reply
Mark

[gyulasun]

....
“The variable reluctance engine” of Jarret brothers and other inventions of them

The patents of Jean and Jaques Jarret â€" the improved model of magnetic variable reluctance engine and the improved model of the free pistons combustion engine; also, another interesting unconventional engines made by the same inventors.
....

Hi Lucian,

Thanks for the great file collection link, I have downloaded it, will take many hours to study them for sure. 
I am curious mainly in the variable reluctance magnet motor, if you do not mind, could you explain in plain English how the magnetic reluctance is varied and why does it not have the usual action-reaction effect (because I assume it has no or only a little  action-reaction effect)?

Regards,
Gyula

[markdansie]

@ Lucian,
Thank you for your detailed reply to my questions:
As for question 1:
I agree in the past there have been interests that would rather see these technologies suppressed. However, governments and even the oil business have changed their thinking as they realise the limited resources available and environmental issues are real. There are now organisations that have large pools of money that are willing and able to support these new technologies. (Email me is you want more details)

If you do have a device you can demonstrate and would be allow others to test it, this can be arranged. I understand it is not your intellectual property, however that can be negotiated if the proof of concept can be demonstrated with the original owners. (Money talks). These test can be done confidentially protecting your identity and privacy. Many devices that appear on this forum have been tested in this manner without public knowledge and the outcomes good and bad remain confidential.

If your device does indeed demonstarte what you claim (even thought it may not be your orginal work) then you can be financed to continue your work.

Once again thank you for your reply
markdansie@bigpond.com (email)
Mark

[Lucian Stefan]

The patents texts of Jarret brothers give all the explanations in terms of variable reluctance engine. Most of that patents are written in english...
The variable reluctance engine has ussually the rotor made from teeth of magnet and interleaved portions of iron (with susceptibility for induction) and the stator with many "polar pieces" which are in fact electromagnets capable to create the rotational magnetic field.
There are in the scheme a number of similarities between the ordinary electric circuit and the variable reluctance circuit :
- the electro-motive force has as equivalent the magneto-motive force ;
- the electric resistance has the equivalent of reluctance ;
- the electric current has the equivalent of magnetiic flux.

The induction made by the polar pieces of the stator act on the rotor material, which react disproportionately, heterogeneous, because its configuration (the teeth) and because the alternation of different material, that respond differently to the induction.
That engine has the big defficiency of the reactive torque which tend to brake the rotor in certain conditions. However, the variable reluctance engine need not the brushes and has a simple technology.

Jarret brothers have improved that kind of engine, they made a compact and efficient model in the '60th, with direct applications in the field of propulsion systems. If you wish to know much more about that engine and the Jarret brother's another interesting inventions, read the files from the given link.