Understanding electricity in the TPU.

[giantkiller]

Ok, clowns! Hitch up your giddy. The circus is leaving town.

Let us begin:
Outside of all your vanities, careers, and views the basic premise is this:
One or more Oscillators. If you would like to use 1 then you have to have the correct frequency that matches the atomic structure and configuration of your transmitter and this is definately in need of great discipline of any selected field, guaranteed. Mechanically speaking. We have done this or tried. You can even use 1 frequency to accomodate the use of two frequencies. I refer to the configurations of two dissimilar materials. Mine have been steel and copper, copper and iron. One presents an conductive difference to the other. You therefore get the 2 phased action of 1 frequency working on 2 materials or impedances.
With a Tesla coil we have 2 coils tuned together in some timing aspect. 1 frequency? Well yes but when you consider the highspeed, broadband output the coils produce interaction.

Now Lets look at 2 or more frequencies:
This takes less effort in configuration or control mechanically but more control in the phasing or timing. Why yes, we all have seen this too.
Hit a target with 2 or more frequencies and you will get interaction. Can you say Hutchison? Why are his tests so random? Because he doesn't have the timing correct. But it does get there. No?

So instead of banging a fet or pulsing just correct or squeezing physics on your bench. Give it up! Why not try banging 2 or more fets! Come on, it works. Fry your ass in the experiment too. Or why not try cmos switching(ooh low current) with 3 channels of close frequencies against copper coils or close configuration. Come on. You know you want to try it. Why do I say this? Lets make a seperation here and I want the reader to use this as a yardstick. In all the posting what doth the poster reveal? Physics? Tuning? Transmission and reception? Why yes. The emphasis is on the number of frequencies applied. Always! If you want to use 1 then you have a choice of the correct physics(ouch that sucks), spark gap or NST.
Now in the pulsing we can use low voltage 5 - 48 voltas square wave or if you want to use sines the HV is needed. Low voltage sine takes extreme configuration. The HV square wave will and I repeat will burn you or knock you on your ass. What is in between? You fry equipment. The square wave gives us the timing we need by the rise and fall. That is why low frequencies work. Sines on the other hand have to achieve this function in other ways.

There is nothing else to try outside these aforementioned boundaries.

'Nuff sed?

Arguments, Please? I welcome them. They will be comprised of pontifications or bloat.

Now go back to you benches and work with two or more frequencies(can you say ECD?). With the fustration of all the years past you have accumulated vast amounts of effort to understand and see the experience.

Most of us don't have the experience or setup for one frequency. After all the SM17 is 2... 556s are 2. The ECD is 2. THE GK4 is 3. Didn't SM say 'Bang on'? Hmmm...

You can spend your time on 1 frequency and mysterious configurations, or HV/sparkgap simplistic noise, or multiple frequencies.

There I have stated what was not said before but now it becomes very apparent.

--gk. I gotta go and burn the soapbox for fuel.

p.s. So instead of competing with the laws of physics let the frequencies do the work for you. Any 2 coils next to each other each with its own frequency. This is the biggest hint there is.

I built an invisible man with a transparent ego and empty pride.

[bolt]

So, you are afraid to get yor hands dirty.  Probably have never wound a single coil in your entire life.  You go around posting endless rants about the work of others and your interpretations of it, but never do any work yourself.  You stated several times that you can build a working TPU if provided with $25K for a lab.  If you know so much about the TPU's then maybe you can tell us how they are wound.  They are not all the same.

Have you ever built anything that works?  Like a model or birdhouse?  I just want to know if you can follow directions.

Read my posts i disclosed everything about the TPU years ago not seen anything to make me think i made a mistake. In fact everyone else getting closer and closer to my ideas... Maybe people are waking up perhaps the TPU coming soon:)

I made a model airplane once.

[sigma16]

I've made a mistake and thought some of the individuals in this thread were getting the RE effect, but were stuck at how to convert it to current.  I see this thread is just for tossing ideas around and winding pretty coils.  You are no further along now then when you first started.  Have fun.

[giantkiller]

BS @SG16,
The GK4 does produces RE. You show me your config and tell us all how to safely convert it.
OBTW I got coil what you got?. Builds, tests, equipment? Or just posts. C'mon anti up.
Just how many ways are there to skin a cat? Or was this a test? Air coils have copper ya know? Not just posts.

[sparks]

Take a wound rotor induction motor and lock the rotor.  Put 3 single phase loads in the lines to reduce the locked rotor currents so that they just saturate the stator steel.  Replace the resistor bank with a capacitor bank tuned to the inductance of the rotor coils.  Leave some resitive device like an inverter or converter in the rotor tanks.  Now you have a Tesla rotating field transformer.  Running 3 single phase loads in the primary and 3 tuned tank circuits in the secondary.  The currents in a rotor when an induction motor is working sweep across the stator conductors and generate a counter emf to the line.  When the rotor is locked this is not the case.