Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!

Started by giantkiller, October 29, 2009, 02:31:19 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

e2matrix

Quote from: gyulasun on July 09, 2010, 12:56:59 PM
Hi,  you wrote 20,000 Volts, I think you wanted to write 20,000 eVolts, correct?
Here is an energy conversion calculator between eV and Joule:
http://www.unitconversion.org/energy/electron-volts-to-joules-conversion.html
It says 20000 eV gives 3.2e-15Joule. This seems a very small energy gain...  probably I miss something.

rgds,  Gyula
Nope I'm sure you are right Gyula.  You just caught me ignoring that little voice in my head saying "I bet there is a significant difference between eVolts and Volts".  LOL...   I guess I knew someone here who's a lot more current than I am would catch it if it was important.  Thanks Gyula.  It does appear that is a very significant difference. 

NickZ

    @ Otto and All:
     Thank you for clarifying the use of ONE frequency pulse to the coils. What then is the frequency that has been working best so far?
  The two or three different tinned copper wire coils are combining to produce the desired effect then?   Like a three note cord (frequencies) interacting inside the coils, but,  being caused to interact by the one pulse that is being sent to the primary coil? 
  So, then what type of coils are used in this case (toroid?), wire size, and what type of core, if any?
 
  You've mentioned that: "But the best signals I see when I disconnect the minus or plus from the coils and mosfets and when I switch the Volts on my scope to the range of 50mV. Amazing signals".
Otto, Can you explain the above observations, a little,  please? 
  I realize that you are still working on it, but maybe a foto of your device would help also.
  Sorry for so many questions, but, as you can see I am paying attension, and, so are the rest of us.
                                                      Nick
                                                 

e2matrix

These frequencies were mentioned in another TPU message thread here (I believe that's where they came from):
Modulation Frequency 1:
222 KHz

Modulation Frequency 2:
115 KHz

Fundamental Frequency:     
30.075 KHz

THE ABOVE THREE FREQUENCIES ARE THE THREE SECRET INPUT FREQUENCIES for the 15" TPU, PER SM!"

It may have come from a .pdf file somewhere possibly Bob Boyce ?  I've also seen reference to 5 Khz and some other frequencies that were worked out by Bruce_TPU on here. 

wattsup

Quote from: NickZ on July 10, 2010, 01:28:02 PM
    @ Otto and All:
 
  You've mentioned that: "But the best signals I see when I disconnect the minus or plus from the coils and mosfets and when I switch the Volts on my scope to the range of 50mV. Amazing signals".
Otto, Can you explain the above observations, a little,  please? 
  I realize that you are still working on it, but maybe a foto of your device would help also.
  Sorry for so many questions, but, as you can see I am paying attention, and, so are the rest of us.
                                                      Nick

When you take the negative off, you then fall into finer resonance pulsing instead of the classic positive/negative controlled pulsing. The waveforms can then fly all over the place, going into very high voltage but very little amperage.

Guys that are doing high frequency pulsing and find an effect, should get into the habit of then taking off the negative to see if the same effect will intensify. In many cases it will. This is why it is so hard to isolate the true reason for an effect if you don't try to take off the negative. You may have to find a new frequency but this will give you a better idea on what is really going on.

The other day I tried a dual ring control coil with center toroid pulsing with both wires. Took off the negative and the output rose higher. Then for some reason I took off the positive also and held the positive in my hand and the coil still lit the led from a good three feet away. The pulse was using my body as the transmitter and my led bank that starts lighting up at 5 vdc lit up very bright. Can't explain it any other way. High frequency pulsing is very omnipresent so it is very hard to figure out what is exactly causing the effect.

NickZ

  @ Wattsup and All:
     Thanks for the explanation.  Looks like you're the superconductor.  I think I get what Otto was saying now, a little better.  Sure would like to see some positive results from all this pulsing, though. I don't see much difference in the wiring of the big JTs compared to the TPU, other than using a higher voltage transistor like the 2N3055 instead on the 2N2222 which has a 12 volt limit.
   So, take  the negative off,  hold the positive, and watch for sparks.  It that it?