Global Warming

[ResinRat2]

Hi Paul,

I read your link, and it does give plenty of articles to link to after that. I knew this guy would be thoroughly hated and attacked, as well as the Petition attacked as well.

RR2

[PaulLowrance]

So you don't see the whole last paragraph you wrote there huh?  Anyone else see it?

Yes. What about it? First you make a claim about me without a single quote. When I call you out on it, it appears as if you grab a random quote and post it. And you can't even state the contradiction?

Paul

[Azorus]

Pual,

"31,000 American scientists opposed, on scientific grounds, to the hypothesis of "human-caused global warming"  Key word is "Human-caused."  This is not about if global warming is real. The data is overwhelming that global warming is real. The temperatures are increasing. This is about what's causing it.

The first line says that 31000 american scientists oppose human-cuased global warming.  Then you go on to write that the dabate is about what causes global warming, because you support human-cuased global warming.  How can you present facts for the other side and say you are not contradicting yourself?

[PaulLowrance]

Hi Paul,

I read your link, and it does give plenty of articles to link to after that. I knew this guy would be thoroughly hated and attacked, as well as the Petition attacked as well.

Hi,
The scientists are only attacking his claims, and for good reasons. One problem is the petition is everything but scientific. The wikipedia article details all of it. The amount of names claimed on the petition is greatly exaggerated. A high % of the people on the petition have changed their mind. The petition made *no* reference to global warming itself not being real, but questions if humans are the main cause. The organization has been funded by Big Oil. On and on and on. It's all in the wiki with references.

Paul

[Azorus]

We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind.
There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.


straight from the petition.  So still no mention of global warming?