STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

[interestedinou]

Hehehe!  I recall posting a photograph with some graphics, where I pointed out that the only difference between the "eorbo" motor and the pulse motor were the position of the coils.  The eorbo coil was on the "neutral line" between the N and S magnets as JLN Labs showed, produces NO CEMF.  Well, Sean has "verified" my find tonight.  ALSO, Stefan was correct in that the pulse motor coils were AIR COILS!  LOL

Goofy:  "So then in general, what are the physical differences between the two motors?"


SEAN:  "The only difference was the coils"
Cheers,   

Bruce

It looks like you were right.

[PCB]

Using 37 turns as a reference, I estimate that there is about 4.5 feet of wire wound onto the toroid. If the wire is say 20 gauge then the resistance of the coil would be about 0.06 Ohms. Steorn looks to be using a variable resistor to set down the voltage from the D-cell (1.5 V) to something much less.

Given the inductance of the coil which some here say is about 1H, want level of current would be needed to saturate the core?

[lumen]

Hehehe!  I recall posting a photograph with some graphics, where I pointed out that the only difference between the "eorbo" motor and the pulse motor were the position of the coils.  The eorbo coil was on the "neutral line" between the N and S magnets as JLN Labs showed, produces NO CEMF.  Well, Sean has "verified" my find tonight.  ALSO, Stefan was correct in that the pulse motor coils were AIR COILS!  LOL

Goofy:  "So then in general, what are the physical differences between the two motors?"


SEAN:  "The only difference was the coils"
Cheers,   

Bruce

Edit 1:
SEAN:  "Ok wobble in this arrangement will induce BEMF, full stop"

Technical Note to all, do not have a wobble in the rotor.

Is there a neutral line between opposite polarities or is it only same polarities?
Wouldn't the neutral point only exist with a single rotor magnet or two magnets of the same polarities like the JLN test?

[gravityblock]

PS2. Gravityblock, when will you start saying about UFOs here? I really cannot wait!

Best regards,
Julian S.

It's Ok for Sean to talk about modifying "time frames" and you was in agreement with this, but when I mentioned something about "reverse time flow of current", I'm out there.  Modifying "time frames" is the theory behind the Adams motor also and I provided a link to this.  Isn't a reverse time flow of current in reference to modifying time frames?  I'm out there and Sean is not, but yet I didn't say anything different than what Sean said, lol.  All I did was to expand on it.

You see, It is this kind of limited thinking that will get us nowhere.  The Orbo is based on the same operating principals and theory of the Adams pulse motor, which is modifying time frames and I provided a link showing you how they are based on the same theory. 

Steorn made a few changes by using toroids and dual sets of magnets while using very tight tolerances in the specs and components in order to obtain patents, by-pass other peoples patents, and to get around what has already been open-sourced.

Isn't this forum about sharing thoughts, ideas, having discussions, and theories along with experiments in order to achieve OU?  I can't do this without Striker blowing a nut, but in his eyes it's Ok for him to give his opinions and theories.  Grow up.

Believing in OU or modifying time frames isn't anymore out there than believing in UFO's.  I believe you fall in one of these categories and this makes you just as much out there as I am.


GB

[Airstriker]

Yeah grow up gravityblock and simply test my theory. Don't think it's a big deal. Or simply point out where I'm wrong and be the first one to throw a stone at me.