STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

[PaulLowrance]

BEMF is when the field collapses and cuts the wires (The "B" is for the EMF coming Back to the source).  CEMF is the EMF that is induced by the rotating magnets that is in opposition to the EMF of the pulse (The "C" is for a Counter EMF that is in opposition to the applied EMF).

You have it backwards,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counter-electromotive_force
"Back electromotive force is a voltage that occurs in electric motors where there is relative motion between the armature of the motor and the external magnetic field."

And yes, I refer to it as a permeability motor because it relies on changes in effective permeability.

[gravityblock]

If a moving magnetic field crosses a conductor CEMF exists. It does not have to have an existing current.

If the circuit is open, then it's not opposing anything, thus no CEMF.  Also, If the circuit is open, then it creates a static electric field in the conductor because the charges have nowhere to go.  If the charges aren't moving, then there is no magnetic field induced in the coils to oppose the mechanical motion.  A moving charge induces a magnetic field.  If the charges aren't moving, then there is no induced magnetic field.

Take a coil that is an open circuit and rotate the strongest magnets you can find at 30,000 RPM and see if the coil will drop a magnet.  It will not, because there is no induced magnetic field because the charges aren't moving in the coil.  No CEMF.

GB

[gravityblock]

You have it backwards,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counter-electromotive_force
"Back electromotive force is a voltage that occurs in electric motors where there is relative motion between the armature of the motor and the external magnetic field."

I suggest you re-read the wiki article.  It states, This voltage opposes the original applied voltage; therefore, it is called "counter-electromotive force".  That is not any different than what I referred to as CEMF.  They are referring to CEMF as being electrical opposition (the effect) and BEMF as being mechanical (the cause).  One is the cause and the other is the effect.  There is no reason to over-complicate this, and I refer to both the cause and the effect as CEMF, in order to avoid confusion when talking about the BEMF due to a collapsing field in a coil.

If we know the effect (induced EMF in opposition to the applied EMF or CEMF), then the cause (mechanical energy being converted into electrical energy) should be a given. There is no need in calling the effect and the cause two different things. That is nonsense, redundant, and confusing.

The proper use for BEMF is when the field is collapsing in a coil and the proper use for CEMF is when the induced voltage is in opposition to the applied voltage.  Again, words can have different meanings according to the context they are being used in.

GB

[gravityblock]

If they had of left on voltage you would see one signal was lost due to the inductor filtering it out.
Input signals were exceedingly different due to offset magnets and coils.

That is very well said .  I finished watching the replication videos and they did turn the voltage off in test 2 and 3.  If the voltage was on during tests 2 and 3, we would have seen one signal was lost.  Why was one signal lost?  The signal was lost because the induced EMF of the lower strength magnet was canceled by the EMF of the battery and by the magnets/coils being offset.  We are only seeing the induced EMF from the magnet with the higher strength pole.  They showed in the video that one pole of a magnet was stronger than the other magnet with the opposite pole.  In test 1, the EMF of the lower strength pole didn't completely get canceled, thus we see the EMF of both magnets.

All 3 tests were demonstrating how CEMF works.  In test 3, the EMF induced by the magnets will be in the same direction as Test 2 because the direction of rotation was the same.  The polarity of the battery has nothing to do with how the magnets are inducing an EMF in the toroids.  What determines the direction of the EMF induced by the magnets are the polarity of the magnets and the direction of rotation.


GB

[Bruce_TPU]

Good Evening,

A question to all of the knowledgable people on this thread:   

1.  I have completely wound my metglass core (1.12") to where there is nearly no hole at all.  It is wound with 26 awg magnet wire.

2.  It has the first layer that is shorted with itself.

3.  I am using the following circuit (below) with an IRFZ30 Mosfet.

4.  I am using 5 volts, 2 amps for power.

5.  I can not use my 12 volt battery because the shorted first layer allows the current to flow and melts the wire, and I even used two 1 ohm 10 watt resistors in series and they heat up, so I did away with the 12 volt battery.

6.  Old scope is not working and I am going to order a new one.

7.  Used an LED to make sure that mosfet is switching.

Do I need to wrap another Metglass, but without shorting the first layer?

The problem is either:
1.  Shorted first layer is a problem
2.  Switching circuit is not very good
3.  2 amps is not enough current.

Any and all assistance is appreciated.  I am very good at the mechanical but need some assistance with getting this going.  I have a beautiful setup with two rotors.  One with weak magnets and one rotor with 4 pairs of strong magnets.

Thank you for your assistance,

Bruce
http:/energyfreedomreport.com