Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump

[CompuTutor]

I don't follow.

Has a divine aspect ratio been discovered
I didn't catch reading all this?

[bullsnbears1]

Sorry that doesn't work , the angle change also require wire length change.

I believe that's why he said "sprung center" so that the distance between the rings would be adjusted as opposed to the wire length.

edit: I'm sorry. You're right the secondary coils would need to change length. I'll go back to silent observing!

[CompuTutor]

Correct bullsnbears1

[Talath]

Referring to the most recent picture of a coil above,
in this case, FatBird's Post#587 PVC coupler coil form.

If two two rings were notched,
instead of a single tube.

They could be spaced with a sprung center,
then wound straight initially.



After a loose collector winding around the outside,
you could just turn only one of the rings.

That would give you the ability to test all angles.

The angle would go from zero, to well past 45 degrees easily.

And of course, both sides of zero degress
just in case that reveals more anomalies.

They could be spaced with a sprung center,
then wound straight initially.



After a loose collector winding around the outside,
you could just turn only one of the rings.

That would give you the ability to test all angles.

The angle would go from zero, to well past 45 degrees easily.

And of course, both sides of zero degress
just in case that reveals more anomalies.

I had to think about this for a moment.    Now I understand what you're saying   and the idea is a great test coil for varying primary angle.  Naturally the "tube" length would change as you rotate one ring to adjust the crossover angle, but the diameter and the primary wire length would remain the same.  In essence, as you looked down the bore of the tube, the inner primary windings would look like an iris aperature as you counter-rotated the rings.  You could also change it from a lefthand to a righthand tube instantly.  Perfect!

It couldn't actually be sprung though, else the angle would be 90°, as the spring came to full extension.

I'm wondering how the angle of the secondary in relation to the angle of the parallelogram produced by the primaries would affect the individual fields' density, and their electron incidence on the secondary.  Right now everything is circumferential on the secondary, without respect to its crossover position to the parallelogram.  Definately a lot of dynamics to consider...  What about other than round cross-sectional extrusions for the primary wire?  Would a sharp edge intensify the spin?  Printed primary tube?

-T 

edited -  The more that I think about this setup, the more I realize that the inner primary winding would be further from the outer winding as you counter rotated the rings, with the largest separation being halfway up the height of the tube... the center of the iris as viewed down the tube bore.

[broli]

For the people with the coils and scopes. Could you do a side by side experiment with the same power and loads but using conventional coils. By winding 12 conventional windings per primary on a same sized tube and the same amount of secondary windings used with the special tony coil. This would be a good reference.

@tony do I understand it correctly that the acceleration phenomena happens in the primaries and that the secondary is just picking up the changing magnetic field according to Faraday's equation?