Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Lifters: Anti-gravity or simply ION WIND?

Started by Phil, April 06, 2005, 12:35:16 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

TechStuf

I have certainly proved to my satisfaction that a common dipolar arrangement behaves as described and I cannot perceive a better explanation for my observations than the 'spinning string' description.? Every test of this observation hasn't failed to conform to the model.? It appears as well, that these strings may increase noticeably in size commensurate with field radius.? The vortexual nuances and complexities of field interactions are staggering in consideration.?

I have made considerable comprehensional gains by observing the interactions of large and very tiny magnets as well.

I am working on a website and if it is ever allowed to exist,? I think it might prove somewhat interesting.


Peace,

TS





“For the wisdom of this world is foolishness before God. For it is written, “He is THE ONE WHO CATCHES THE WISE IN THEIR CRAFTINESS” - 1 Corinthians 3:19

http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/sixpointedstar.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBjOs-egFMs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WSGwnz7XpY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l39XsMcyvgA

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/09/297062.shtml

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjjIy1DO0gs

We all have the choice to waste ourselves in rebellion or to gain wisdom.  Therefore, gain wisdom:

http://www.hisremnant.org/eby/articles/kingdom/twohands/twohandsof.html

Kysmett

I'm not sure that proving something to your own satisfaction is really a unit of some measure, but I'm willing to hear your theory in full.  The hints you give in reference to it are intriguing.  Lay it on me.

TechStuf

You know something Kysmett?  Good point.  I'm not sure either, although I would take a stab at it and say: No.


Also, your dedication to sciential protocol is noted.? Take two units of 'my satisfaction' and call me in the morning......


Can I get an lol ?


Seriously though,? I prefer to leave the unit labelling and other such details to the......well, 'detail guys'.? I am working well outside their framework....and wouldn't have it any other way, really.  Besides, I'm positive that the correct names and standards of measurement will be revealed to me in due time by those who are......'more established'.


Peace,

TS
“For the wisdom of this world is foolishness before God. For it is written, “He is THE ONE WHO CATCHES THE WISE IN THEIR CRAFTINESS” - 1 Corinthians 3:19

http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/sixpointedstar.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBjOs-egFMs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WSGwnz7XpY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l39XsMcyvgA

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/09/297062.shtml

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjjIy1DO0gs

We all have the choice to waste ourselves in rebellion or to gain wisdom.  Therefore, gain wisdom:

http://www.hisremnant.org/eby/articles/kingdom/twohands/twohandsof.html

raburgeson

I understand becoming satisfied, you got to do it over and over and you drive
youself crazy about the one test that didn't work out right, and have to be
actually sure, and finally you become (satisfied) not the personal gratification
mind you. Satisfied that you setup the experiment correctly,got the results
recorded correctly,and last but not least have found results that can be
duplicated by anyone, anywhere, anytime ....Any help I can get on vortexes
I will appreciate.When you get your site up let me know.

iceweller

     
     Tesla didn't "skirt" the existence of matter (infact he said a body without force is like a body without a mind, that is what invalidated the re-emerging Relativism which links and exchanges matter with energy) - why did you come to this conclusion? After all he has attempted to explain with his ether theory and his devices, it is rather the contrary. Tesla even "deconstructed" the human being simply saying we all respond to different stimuli, like his described automatons. His research in X-Rays and vacuum tube emissions and their descriptions all have to do with matter intrinsically and the associated effects. I am naturally aware of the possible developments using his technology, but this does not mean one must discard the origins - to the contrary. I see no direct link with his work and the "vortex" research. Yes these are modern times, but this doesn't necessarily mean we are further ahead. As you say, if we were to be given all his classified research, we would need to  pick up from there - "we" as in the general public, not the various "elites" who have been benefitting from this technology until today. The point of departure dates back to the early 1900s, that is what we have left behind and what has been lost and occulted. What do modern Relativistic theories really do? The ether based "electro-propulsion" (ala MHD pumping) worked back in 1900 when Tesla demonstrated it as it did evidently during WWII up unti now, and most of these theories didn't even exist then so why do we need them now? Because they are "old"? Who is to judge this? Why is it that more and more scientists are presenting "new" theories with "their own touch" which are a bad copy of the "basic" Ether Theory? The more we go on, the more sensible scientists will see that there is something wrong, unless they are payed to "dance along" as most are. When we talk about ether theory, there is only ONE Ether theory that holds, despite the fact that one can demonstrate mathematically what he wants to. Then from here, we can develop all sorts of Free Energy or whatever devices one wants, with this or that method, but the base is one and it is solid, it doesn't skew or change in time. Once you learn how to "master" this trick, you can apply it to a variety of different inventions and Tesla mentioned this more than once in his works. The conversion of one type of energy to another is the key to access this, and in his propulsion system the trick is to convert weak mechanical force to strong electro magnetic using the ether as the conversion medium, and it is free. He also mentions this in his "The problem of increasing human energy" document, how to create a neverending "sink" to make a machine work indefinately, such as his self acting oscillator yielding 70% surplus output. So you see, different devices, different situations, but all linked to one theory and one method of using it properly. All that comes directly after this, all the developments and all the inventions are a mere "consequence" - but this doesn't change the fact that it is because of this one theory and how to lever it that all of this is possible. We must not make the mistake of being presumptious and feeling superior due to our present technological state. We are in this critical situation because not enough of us have been able to stand up and realize what has been wiped out from our science text books and from history. There is nothing wrong in looking ahead and into further scientific developments, but we must know where we have been first in order to not be kept running around in circles and achieve nothing.

   Regards

Quote from: raburgeson on April 25, 2005, 11:03:02 AM
Well Tesla was a genius with a high mechanical aptitude wasn't he. You may have noticed
though he skirted the existence of matter completely.A light emits electromagnetic waves
and some of these, his terms can be cross referenced with other peoples as a rope can be
distinguished with vortex. His work has been hidden from us proving it works and the powers
that be don't want his work to reach the hands of the people.But you maybe overlooking
the fact that while they were withholding that work they haven't been sitting on it, they
have gone far beyound his developments and I'm more interested in what developments
they have made beyound his work they are hiding from us that you don't even have a
clue about it's existence.There are a 1000 ways to skin a cat and likely 100 ways to
modify, create, and defeat gravity, and just as likely 100 different ways to produce power in
all the other catagories on this site that haven't been discovered by the people and many
of them aren't known by the government.If they released all his work uncensored today
we'd still be a century behind.