Global Warming Truth

[sparks]

    Couldnt be compilation of data portraying totally unrelated coincidental events could it.  Like man my car broke down and my electric toothbrush battery dropped below useable levels.  I wish my toothbrush wouldnt make my car breakdown.  How naive are you Paul.  You show me one thing nature has done to help man survive as a species and I will gladly donate a buck to some wildlife preservation fund.  Nice move it made on behalf of the Hatian people .  I am sure the world banks will be more then willing to get them some money so they can rebuild.  Of course repayment with interest or seisure of assets.

[Cap-Z-ro]

*admits to growing animals in my greenhouse*

[ResinRat2]

This is an interesting tidbit about Wikipedia that I will throw out to you Lowrance: a University Analytical class I took a little over a year ago specifically required that absolutely NO references from Wikipedia were allowed in any of the written material. The Professor stressed that Wikipedia was NOT considered a reliable reference.

You crack me up, posting around here as if screaming and implying with your words that no one has shown you anything that reliably contradicts your conclusions of human-caused Global Warming. All the while you are picking and choosing what you will decide to believe. Well we can do the same thing. My conclusions are that your sources are biased toward that conclusion, and reject any contradictory data. Who do you think you are? As if you think that by continually trying to get in the last word that you will be the one who is right and the rest wrong. What a joke you are. The rest of us see how biased and close-minded you are as well.

Your sources are biased, and their conclusions are wrong. I don't care if you don't like it, that's too bad. I have worked in Research ever since I was 21 years old. I just turned 50 last year. Does that mean that I don't understand Research and Development and the Scientific Method? I can see that all these Global-Warming conclusions are being driven forward for a POLITICAL Agenda, not for a Scientific one. That is what I see. I have also seen the other sides of the argument, the other graphs, conclusions, and explanations. I find their conclusions more credible and in line with the reality of the planet, solar system, and the way nature works.

Al Gore is a scumbag. I don't care how many awards he has received from Organizations that have Socialist Agendas. The guy is a rotten egg who desires great power, greater wealth, and even greater control over the political landscape. People like you just roll over and kiss his a## like he is some kind of Savior, like Obama. They have your sorry self in adoring glee; and people like me need to fight people like you every chance we get the motivation to keep on fighting. The future of Liberty for future Generations depends on it.

You, however will never see it and never understand the concept of what Liberty requires. The bad guys are laughing at you because they have you controlled like a puppet.

[PaulLowrance]

This is an interesting tidbit about Wikipedia that I will throw out to you Lowrance: a University Analytical class I took a little over a year ago specifically required that absolutely NO references from Wikipedia were allowed in any of the written material. The Professor stressed that Wikipedia was NOT considered a reliable reference.

Well, given that I know for fact you are a liar; e.g., your massive list of quotes that you said were mine, and now we all know they were not my quotes, not even close.

Therefore, there is zero chance I would take your word for it. In fact, your hatred toward this topic is very clear, and the amount of out right lies you have posted has been pointed out in this thread. So I would not take your word for nothing!

And even if it's true what you say about some class, it is entirely pointless. That's like saying, "Gee, I found a scientist that believes man was created by a God."  Ummm, so what if you can find a scientists that believes in something? I am interested in data, and that's exactly what WikiPedia is for, peer reviewed references.   Geez, how many times must I say it before it sinks into your head?

[sparks]

  @Cap

  Thats another thing.  As the co2levels rise wouldnt this be like talking to your plants to help them grow.  My kid was into cultivating plants and kept on plaguing me to make him a little motor that would  fill up a greenhouse with co2 every hour or so from paintball gun canisters.  Said he could make a fortune on it selling it to stoners all overthe world along with a UV flurescent lamp kit and a terrarium.  Something like expand your mind starter kit.  So as the co2 levels rise plant life is promoted.  So we are actually in the long run contributing to co2 level dropping by helping plants grow. 
   Man I feel so relieved I can breath without feeling guilty about my carbon footprint as the footprint seems to be getting covered by leaves which will rot oh no if they rot and there is a forest fire my breathing will condemn the world to global warming via plants growing and burning.  Fuck it I am so confused at this point I am going to find my kids stash and forget about it.