Global Warming Truth

[PaulLowrance]

Ah, here's a graph that goes back to the year 1000! And the obvious sudden rise in global temperatures at the dawn of industrial age. Oh how Big Oil must hate such data with a passion. You can't hide that kind of data, as it's been globally distributed for a long time.

Still waiting for some scientific data to disprove global warming. It is not due to the Sun, as Solar irradiance correlation has holes in it. It's not due to plants & animals, as their population has dwindled with human population. So far the only positive correleation is humanity, which is why the recent pole shows that *over* 97% of *active publishing* climatologist believe *humanity* is the significant cause of global warming.     It's obvious why these people at this forum oppose this. They lie and are deceitful. It will be interesting to find out their motive.

[sparks]

      Sounds like man envy to me.  The animals are easily controlled whereas man is aware of who and what he is.  Unlike the prototype lifeforms that are not the sharpest tools in the shed.  I pray for the enlightenment of such creatures.  Their vary existence testifies to the Universal Power of tolerance and love.  I do not represent big oil or any other money based scramble for false wealth.  The reality at least mine is that fossil fuel exploitation has made possible the proliferation of mankind on this planet.  This allows more forms of life that have reached a level of awareness to commune with the higher forms of life that pocess enough intellect to know they are of God and do not seperate themselves from God. 

[ResinRat2]

So, after reading 3 pages of new posts, nobody could show any evidence that global warming is not true. And they wonder why over 97% of active publishing climatologist believe humanity is a significant cause of global warming.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_consensus

So Lowrance, I went to your hyperlink at the bottom of your post, which references Wikipedia, of course, but the very first footnote at the bottom of the page (Footnote #1) references the survey you so proudly display and shout "97% of active publishing climatologist believe humanity is a significant cause of global warming."

http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf

On the far right column it displays the questions that were asked:

1.When compared with pre-1800s levels, do you think that mean global temperatures have generally risen, fallen, or remained relatively constant?
2.Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?

Then it continues and says:

“In our survey, the most specialized and knowledgeable respondents (with regard to climate change) are those who listed climate science as their area of expertise and who also have published more than 50% of their recent peer-reviewed papers on the subject of climate change (79 individuals in total). Of these specialists, 96.2% (76 of 79) answered “risen” to question 1 and 97.4% (75 of 77) answered yes to question
2.”

What? Is this the survey you so proudly display? Look what it says. Your “over 97%” number is based off a total of 79 people, and only 77 of them agreed. It wasn’t even unanimous, and it is based off of 79 people?

What are you going to say now Lowrance? That I am a liar, that I changed Wikipedia? Read it for yourself.

[PaulLowrance]

So Lowrance, I went to your hyperlink at the bottom of your post, which references Wikipedia, of course, but the very first footnote at the bottom of the page (Footnote #1) references the survey you so proudly display and shout "97% of active publishing climatologist believe humanity is a significant cause of global warming."

http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf

On the far right column it displays the questions that were asked:

1.When compared with pre-1800s levels, do you think that mean global temperatures have generally risen, fallen, or remained relatively constant?
2.Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?

Then it continues and says:

“In our survey, the most specialized and knowledgeable respondents (with regard to climate change) are those who listed climate science as their area of expertise and who also have published more than 50% of their recent peer-reviewed papers on the subject of climate change (79 individuals in total). Of these specialists, 96.2% (76 of 79) answered “risen” to question 1 and 97.4% (75 of 77) answered yes to question
2.”

What? Is this the survey you so proudly display? Look what it says. Your “over 97%” number is based off a total of 79 people, and only 77 of them agreed. It wasn’t even unanimous, and it is based off of 79 people?

What are you going to say now Lowrance? That I am a liar, that I changed Wikipedia? Read it for yourself.

Are you okay, LOL.  You act as if there's something wrong. It's a great recent survey done by a University on *active publishing* climatologist. Not the fake unscientific deceitful petition done by your side who is not a scientist.

You don't even know that you've shown support for Global Warming.

[ResinRat2]

  Paul Lowrence's link is based off of 79 people on the whole planet, and only 77 of them agreed humans cause global warming. What a joke you are Lowrance.