Global Warming Truth

[tbird]

Stunning: NASA GISS Admits No Evidence of AGW In The US, Won’t Be For Decades!

http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/12532

[PaulLowrance]

Stunning: NASA GISS Admits No Evidence of AGW In The US, Won’t Be For Decades!

http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/12532

That blogger is lying. He does not even show the graphs. One of the attached graphs shows the US temperatures.  Clearly a warming trend in the US. Here are the graphs. One of the graphs separates rural & major city temperatures. Notice how rural temperatures show no warming trend, but major city temperatures show warming trend. That is not hardcore proof that humanity is the significant, which is what over 97% of active publishing climatologist are saying.

Another attached graph shows the fluctuations over time between global cooling and warming. Once again, those are fluctuations. If we analyzed the global temperature by month, we would see global cooling / warming fluctuating on a yearly basis. If we took global temperatures on a daily basis, we would see global cooling / warming fluctuating on a monthly basis, lol.  A scientist understands the difference between a trend and fluctuations.

The United States is showing the same warming trend since the industrial age as the global, and we can clearly see that it occurs in *cities*.

[silverfish]

Stunning: NASA GISS Admits No Evidence of AGW In The US, Won’t Be For Decades!

http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/12532

UN Climate Chief admits mistake on Himalayan Glaciers warning:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6994774.ece

More errors identified in UN Climate Change Panel assessing Himalayan Glaciers - Dr. Rajendra Pachauri dismissing calls for him to resign:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6999051.ece

UK Parliamentary House of Commons Science and Technology Committee launches investigation into Climategate to find out the implications of the disclosures for the integrity of scientific research:

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100023449/wow-uk-parliamentary-investigation-into-climategate-may-not-be-a-whitewash/

Sanity Check: 2008 and 2009 were the coolest years since 1998 in the USA:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/23/sanity-check-2008-2009-were-the-coolest-years-since-1998-in-the-usa/#more-15539

Arctic temperatures above 80 degrees N are the lowest in six years:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/23/arctic-temperatures-above-80%c2%b0n-are-the-lowest-in-six-years/#more-15548

And last but not least, Climategate - CRU was but the tip of the iceberg:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/01/climategate_cru_was_but_the_ti.html

[ResinRat2]

I love this description in your final link, silverfish:

'And this from the computer expert:

    That the bias exists is not denied.  That the data are too sparse and with too many holes over time in not denied.  Temperature series programs, like NASA GISS GIStemp try, but fail, to fix the holes and the bias.  What is claimed is that "the anomaly will fix it."  But it cannot.  Comparison of a cold baseline set to a hot present set must create a biased anomaly.   It is simply overwhelmed by the task of taking out that much bias.  And yet there is more.  A whole zoo of adjustments are made to the data.  These might be valid in some cases, but the end result is to put in a warming trend of up to several degrees.  We are supposed to panic over a 1/10 degree change of "anomaly" but accept 3 degrees of "adjustment" with no worries at all. To accept that GISTemp is "a perfect filter". That is, simply, "nuts".  It was a good enough answer at Bastogne, and applies here too.

Smith, who had a family member attached to the 101st Airborne at the time, refers to the famous line from the 101st commander, U.S. Army General Anthony Clement McAuliffe, who replied to a German ultimatum to surrender the December, 1944 Battle of Bastogne, Belgium with a single word: “Nuts.” '

It just goes to show you, the "NUTS" are the ones giving us the warnings. Their bias is so strong toward the lie of Human Caused Global Warming that they will lie and conceal the truth. The graph that shows the global cooling trend shows it plainly. People like Lowrance - who accuse others of lies - use data filled with lies.
-- Oh wait, just like Lowrance keeps spouting off: over 97% of actively publishing climatologists say we are the cause of global warming, you know; those 77 out of 79 climatologists. 77 scientists out of the whole population of about six BILLION people. Of course, according to Lowrance, everyone else is wrong or a liar or a supporter of big oil.

People like him are the enemy of human freedom and truth.

[Cap-Z-ro]

Shhh, be quiet you 2 !!!

You're gonna wake Paul up for ats sake.

Have some consideration !!!

Sheesh...