All of Stanley Meyer's Equipment FOUND Including Dune Buggy! (Videos Here)

[MarkE]

Well Mark, thank you for asking my opinion.  Here it is.  You have already "explained yourself" quite thoroughly throughout various threads you have posted in here on this forum.  I am sure there is no clarity needed concerning your views on responsibility.  I consider your answer a "rant" when it appears throughout a thread over and over again.  Check this thread.  Perhaps you are unaware that you repeat yourself again, again and still again (redundancy).


Whose responsibility is it to prove "extraordinary claims"?  It is obviously the claimant, as you have repeated over and over again (which most should know by now by heart).  Do I believe this is correct?  YES, it should go without saying.   

well that point of view seems to be at odds with the questions you asked:

@Mark E:
Replication seems to be very important to you so you must have attempted to replicate Stan's demonstration fuel cell, right?  Could you at least show your attempted replication of Meyer's cell? 

If you recognize that the burden of proof rests with the person making the extraordinary claim why would you conclude that I have ever had any reason to replicate Stan Meyer's set-ups when I do not promote his claims?  What was your reasoning behind your stated assumption that I must have done that?

[chessnyt]

well that point of view seems to be at odds with the questions you asked:

If you recognize that the burden of proof rests with the person making the extraordinary claim why would you conclude that I have ever had any reason to replicate Stan Meyer's set-ups when I do not promote his claims?  What was your reasoning behind your stated assumption that I must have done that?

Because many people here are actual builders and I was just curious to see if you were one of them (at least when it came to electrolysis).  I didn't ask you to prove ANY claim concerning electrolysis.  The answer I was looking for was "yes" or "no", minus the standard rant we all have memorized.

[Poit]

well that point of view seems to be at odds with the questions you asked:

If you recognize that the burden of proof rests with the person making the extraordinary claim why would you conclude that I have ever had any reason to replicate Stan Meyer's set-ups when I do not promote his claims?  What was your reasoning behind your stated assumption that I must have done that?

Your logic is sound. If I were you I wouldn't feed the trolls any more. Whats the point? You are clearly right in everything you have said.

Like you have said, the burden is on the person/s making extraordinary claim/s and not everyone else. He even admitted that, so what ever he has to say (bar an apology) isn't worth replying to.

[MarkE]

Because many people here are actual builders and I was just curious to see if you were one of them (at least when it came to electrolysis).  I didn't ask you to prove ANY claim concerning electrolysis.  The answer I was looking for was "yes" or "no", minus the standard rant we all have memorized.

Chesnyt that is all fine and well but you have not answered my question.  I have been polite enough to answer your questions.  Kindly answer mine:

If you recognize that the burden of proof rests with the person making the extraordinary claim why would you conclude that I have ever had any reason to replicate Stan Meyer's set-ups when I do not promote his claims?  What was your reasoning behind your stated assumption that I must have done that?

[chessnyt]

Chesnyt that is all fine and well but you have not answered my question.  I have been polite enough to answer your questions.  Kindly answer mine:

I already answered your question.  Think hard and figure it out, please.  And thanks