All of Stanley Meyer's Equipment FOUND Including Dune Buggy! (Videos Here)

[MarkE]

Follow then markE, follow them.

Armcortex, Chessnyt is entitled to his opinions and how he chooses to conduct himself.  If he wants to pack up his marbles and retreat to Rosemary Ainslie's web site where I believe he is an admin, then that is his choice.  The site as Chessnyt notes offers a "very different experience".  That is because dissenting opinions are routinely edited or censured, while the administrators themselves engage in very rude personal attacks on even the most polite and patient posters such as poynt99. 

[chessnyt]

Chessnyt it is your choice not to produce here what you claim is evidence that supports your claims here where such evidence would be subjected to scrutiny.  If evidence only looks good where it is not challenged, then how good can the evidence really be?

@MarkE:
If you had taken the time to read my last post, which I have quoted below, you would already know that I make no scientific claims to having proof.  Please read paragraph number two again and you will see that I, to the contrary, stated I have no scientific proof.  This is why I am still experimenting with the tubal cluster array I have already built.

@Loner:
See what I mean?  Already you have a guy spitting out the same thing, over and over again.   Like we all have not heard this before. Like they are actually contributing something meaningful.   And then you have their friends telling me things I will have to suk.  This is proof of the low caliber of people posting here.  They actually get away with talking like this here.  You will not have this experience at the link posted at the bottom of this post.




I don't know for sure what Stan Meyer's results were actually, as I have no proof.  I am simply reserving judgement until all of my research and data intake is complete.  Replication is the only way this is going to be accomplished, as replication is the scientific approach to verify ANY technology.  I am determined to replicate Meyer's original technology whether the nay sayers like it or not.




Now people coming here and making these OBVIOUSLY negative statements think that we don't know that what we are trying to accomplish is "impossible".  As if we haven't heard these things a million times before.  If you go to the Alcoholics Anonymous web site, don't be surprised to hear people talk about addictions.  It's no different here.  The name of the forum is Overunity.com.  Why would you come here if you expected to find nobody talking about over unity devices or the replications of them?  Hello?  Come on now.
















LINK:
http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php/topic,2533.0.html

[MarkE]

@MarkE:
If you had taken the time to read my last post, which I have quoted below, you would already know that I make no scientific claims to having proof.  Please read paragraph number two again and you will see that I, to the contrary, stated I have no scientific proof.  This is why I am still experimenting with the tubal cluster array I have already built.





   

Chessnyt, why the straw man?  I said "evidence". 

[ARMCORTEX]

Yeah I know right, if theres one thing I hate its those damned small sites.

Yeah, those pesky moderators of small sites, they never learn.

They are trouble, those damned moderators, should be a law against this right.

Follow them MarkE, follow them.

[TommeyLReed]

Hello,

I don't know what it will take for people to understand Stan Meyer was a fraud, seems to me I can add to his claims.

I think Stan's HHO system used poo as the eletrolyte, as much BS this guy added to his system it's the only real secret that really worked.

Some of you HHO inventors, please add poo to the electrolytes. If you need this special formula, I have lots of extra poo you can have.

Don't forget to mix it well, or the gas just might stink too much.

That's my two cents today!

Tom