Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Magnetic amplification and neutralization motor by Art Porter

Started by LarryC, February 20, 2010, 05:07:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

synchro1

P channel Mosfet: This voltage gate controlled Field effect Transistor as a switch is much more sensitive then the current gate transistor. The proximity of the ground to the gate is a field effect that triggers the switch with no contact at very high frequency. This transistor will amplify the output a thousand times!


Fish for a flutter area in adjacency of the coil. Maybe a spacer between the magnet and coil will open an area that picks the field oscillation up. You only need a tiny area to self oscillate the coil at high frequency.

synchro1

The load is between the ground and P channel MOSFET on the right; This is the correct configuration.

alextecmen

Thanks for the scheme  synchro1

Returning to work, the core of the coil with which I was working were welding rods, I replaced it with a solid core, to see what changes would occur, perhaps increase the induction a little more.

A test that made the voltage increased more, to 60 volts, and the back fem force increased, as well as the consumption, it was to be expected, well that is normal, more voltage, more induction, but also more consumption, I wondered there is not the via, because it is about achieving more induction with less consumption.

Well, to test the prototype with a relay, I bought a 24-volt car, in order to activate it I used a dc motor speed control.

Testing a spotlight first to see flicker when you control it with cruise control.

Already connected with the coil and with the relay and speed control, and a bulb with a rectifier to take advantage of the induction of the back fem, the circuit came into operation, the brightness of the bulb was not what was expected, it was low, and the consumption high Around 2.3 amps, and increasing the control frequency did not get better results.

It must be taken into account that the frequency of the speed control and its waveform is not the most suitable, for this device, nor the car relay is also not the most suitable. but I wanted to try with a relay and with a signal, and that's what I could get for now.

It is seen how the shape of the signal and the frequency are important to improve the induction of this Art Porter device.

I did a test with the magnets in attraction, to see what happened, and the result was the induction was not adequate, the focus had a minimum light, with which it can be deduced that the opposition of the NN poles gives us a better contribution to induction back fem.

The strength of the neodymium magnets is tremendous when I was placing them on the coil, they get together and catch my fingers, which hurts me, I'm fine, but you have to be very careful.

With what I did today, I can conclude that you have to have the right relay, the right signal generator.

Although, on the other hand, I have obtained the best result using my 8-strip contact disc, I am going to improve that rotor, I believe that you can have good results already with the rotor well done with copper plates, with contact carbons, etc.

Tomorrow I'm going to try another coil, it has more turns and a thicker core, I'll see what improvements I can get.

Little by little I am learning more and experimenting more, I am also going to start acquiring the pieces of Mr. Art Porter's project, 3 "x 1/2" magnets, wire? , the dayton 5x852 relay, the most expensive is the 2601 control.

I appreciate your information and comments, as well as your contributions.

NdaClouDzzz

Just an FYI
Aaron Murakami did an interview with Paul Babcock and Paul gave a very simple recipe for an effective core material:
https://youtu.be/WXMWvloZBgQ?t=1045

Aaron made a video documenting the core build process: https://youtu.be/kpHEyzvc4dY

Paul is a Flyback guy (back emf), and so anyone experimenting as such should find Paul's teachings to be helpful.

alextecmen

Thanks, I already saw the first video, and if your experiments are very interesting and important, it guides us, when you comment when the power is cut, the collapsed field provides a very fast induction high voltage and little current, and shows us how He found a solution and how to use the back emf.

Just a question where is the engine you mentioned can be built, are there replicas?

I will continue watching the following videos, thank you.