Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[ltseung888]

Pictures could be easily faked - videos require much more effort. Also we need to see ALL AT ONCE that means 100% of your device + wiring + probes/probe wires and scope screen text MUST be visible at all times. A single wire coming off of the screen will cause doubts and unecessary talks.

This is the way every device should be represented to general public in case of inventor is sincerely willing to share info educate and help others.

Devices with bunched up/or partially visible wires coming out from everywhere helps little...

Minde

Dear Minde,

You must have seen hundreds if not thousands of video on youtube claiming OU.  I do not intend to be one of the many thousands.

We went to at least 4 Universities in Hong Kong.  One of the top Professors (Head of Department) said, “You do not need to explain your technology to us any more.  We understand it thoroughly.  We can build the prototypes better than you.  But you must understand the stigma of being labeled as â€" working on the impossible perpetual motion machine.”

We now have a chance to work with the US Army Laboratory with the help from Maj. Todd Hathaway.  There is a good chance to get UCI, University of Maryland or the like involved. 

In my prayer, I pray for the scenario of having the Ambassador of China or Dr. Steven Chu, the US Energy Secretary to strike the first tuning fork and nineteen others will resonate in sympathetic vibration.  A TV documentary of that and the lighting of the Christmas Trees by President Obama will bring smiles to my face.  Such technology is available now.  The humble yours truly can provide it.

So be patient.  The absolute and conclusive proofs will come.

Blessed be the Almighty.  He is working miracles in bringing the US and Chinese scientists and politicians to work together.  The Energy Crisis of the World is over.  

[XS-NRG]

The absolute and conclusive proof that i am a CLOWN will come.

[rave154]

dear oh dear,

Tseung talking of getting the likes of MIT & stanford involved, the US secretary of energy...and obama to light up the OU christmas tree.....and yet Tseung hasnt ( wont ? ) produce a video giving the flimsy reason of not wanting to be labeled a fraud ....and he still does not understand or comprehend that you CANNOT use peak-to-peak voltage measurements to "prove" OU.....he also does not seem to comprehend that LED's are non-linear as a "load".

i'd bang my head against a wall in frustration but Tseung would probbaly say that the vibrations are proof of a Resonant-lead-in-energy from the wall 

[rave154]

Tseung,

if you truely want to convince people that you really have something ( and you seem to want this ).......then produce a video or at least re-do your tests using something OTHER than  LED's.....use a linear load,...... a high wattage resistor would do ( one that isnt going to heat up and change its resistance )

if you do this.,...then you may well get more people on your side

and please dont reply with the "i cant use anything other than LED's otherwise it changes the resonance".....thats a sure give-away that youre full of it.

do the test using a linear load, preferably using a FWBR going to a CAP with the load resistor across the cap to get pure DC wattage output..........then you may get somewhere........but all of this pissing around with non-linear LED's and peak-to-peak voltage measurements is just getting tiresome and just plain silly !

[XS-NRG]

nope he has nothing but he is a clown